Leclerc has worse armor then Type-10, especially in gun breach and hull section, first wrong claim.
İt has 6 second reload, second wrong claim.
So you want even better reload time on Type-10 with armor buff?
Leclerc should get its proper armor values, reload time and better shell, out of question.
Gonna need source to see that.
the reload was meant the IRL reload of the leclerc i was just saying how things should go for this tanks if it was reallistic the Type 10 does have worse armor at this point for some reason you want to take my words out of context the gun breach of the Leclerc its worse of course its missing armor but aswell that goes for the type 10 also the Type 10 does have worse armor
Against DM53 fired from 500 meters:
Against DM53 fired from 500 meters:
also regarding sources:
Which is still a wrong claim considering many sources states 5 second reload is the real value for standart reload time, not to mention we were talking about in game values.
İt doesnt, Type-10 has 3 level of armor protection and even then base level should be able to stop its own round from point blank. Both tanks probably have similiar armor profiles when it comes to hull armor protection based on documents, Leclerc beats Type-10 when it comes to turret protection irl.
İts not just missing armor Leclerc’s breach is also gigantic compare to Type-10, nevertheless almost every tank suffers in this area(except certain nation but i will not discuss it right now).
You just proved that Leclerc is even more miserable then Type-10 with those photos, entire hull armor is weakspot on Leclerc while both shares similiar weakness on turret section.
Yea its safe to say Type-10 has better protection from front overall.
Sure bug report when?
Just sayin this is about the leopard not the type 10 or leclerc. Maybe move it somewhere else or something?
True, my bad.
yeah srry
there is a difference between incompetent and refusing to do it
gaijin is professional at the latter one…
Wait so 2A7V is missing LWS as well?
It’s a 2A7VA1/2A8. It also btw, confirms new hull armour @Smin1080p ;))))))))
So much for the devs “we have no reason to believe the armour was upgraded” argument.
Im just gonna put this pic here until they did anything about issues on A7V
which, quite unfortunately, would only arrive s∞n
Need more proof man, not enough informations about how much the protection should be, we need hard values!!
Still not the biggest fan of trophy but good
well we never get the armor
Also was 3bm59/60 always able to pen the beak? on the 2a7v just happend now a few times and it makes me wondering
Not sure which one is ingame or rather i forgot since i dont care about russian ammo xD
Just happened to me in the last game i was, i stopped playing to watch the replay because i thought the guy shooting me really sus and the shot that got me was on the beak. Really weird.
If so then in-game model is incorrect since it lacks LWS sensors.
@MuricaxSuffers
L27/DM43-KE-W-OFL 120 F1/3BM60 can sometimes pen the beak, yes.
I said that in-game, the model of 2A7V lacks the sensors; No dome, no cylinder, no scattered sensors, etc.
Not that the tank itself IRL lacks it.
The 2A7V in game lacks the sensors, just like the IRL counterpart. As i said, what Furina sent refers to 2A7VA1 and 2A8 which are different tanks.
Ah, I misunderstood your “It” at the beginning of your post.
