Update:
No reports forwarded since I last updated the list.
No changes to the Leopard 2A7V in game since release 2.33 (now .114)
Thats just depressing
Nah, THIS is depressing
what’s that against
I know, so far I am pretty dissapointed in the armor. Expected so much more from fighting the swedes with their 122s more than enough. Atleast the thermals are great tho, and it looks nice
Probably DM53, although it doesnt make a difference with other rounds I believe
real sadness
vs
Devastation
Anything over 600mm pen
Only that both of those are pretty much accurate against modern APFSDS while the Leo is massively underperforming.
Yes it’s sad but at least not butchered
Not the CR2 composite is wrong
and the breech is wrong
the list goes on
But that still wouldn’t stop high pen APFSDS unfortunately
With the breach its the same case with the newer Leos (2A5 and up, uncluding the Strv 122s)
do you want me to post all the bugs as i don’t want to do it in this topic
No I’m aware of the issues on the Chally.
oh ok i hope they fix the add on armour and then do the same to other western tanks that use something simlar
Type 10 is the most wrong one between all MBT’s not only the armor model is not covering the right ammount but it’s wrong it’s missing armor and the Hull armor is reversed and upside down The type 10 armor model it’s pretty much wrong in every sense including breach wich it’s funny and sad
Someone is forgetting Leclerc as Well.
Both tanks have wrong values on every section but Leclerc in this case is even worse.
well with leclerc you could remove the armor and the tank would benefit from it
with the leclerc is really bad but not at the point that even the armor model itself its wrong like the type 10, its not like the leclerc armor its reversed and upside down it just has the wrong armor values as of rn
No armor=no spalling
No spalling=no damage.
İts a win win, i like it.
At least you have some hull armor with much better reload and penetration on Type-10.
That bein said both tanks should recieve proper treatment in this case.