If you think the Leo 1 is bad, use the AMX-30. It only has heat, which is awful, and it is much taller and harder to hide. Or try out the Ikv-91 which is only 8.0 because of its lrf.
Make sure you are using APDS, and aiming properly.
If you think the Leo 1 is bad, use the AMX-30. It only has heat, which is awful, and it is much taller and harder to hide. Or try out the Ikv-91 which is only 8.0 because of its lrf.
Make sure you are using APDS, and aiming properly.
You have CheatFS
Am I the only one that likes the T-54? I use the swedish one a lot and I prefer it over the centurion mk. 10 since it has the nuke aphe round.
Yeah except the premium TO-55 is the same BR with a two-plane stabilizer lol
HEAT-FS is awful in WT. APDS is a better choice on the Leopard 1 because it spalls more, and is more reliable.
I mean that doesn’t really make the T-54 bad. Also, BR compression go brrrrr.
I’d consider the mobility to be the same. Only half the 20mm rounds actually damage vehicles, and it actively hinders you when using it, due to the fact is blinds you when you fire it. It also isn’t equal to the cannon, so you never know where it is aiming when moving/stopping.
The HEAT round is terrible and doesn’t overpressure half the time. I wish it has APDS.
Too bad the LFP is too large to not aim at.
Overall, I’d consider the Leo 1 better in most situations, but they aren’t worthy of any Br difference.
AMX-30: 720hp, 36 tons. 20.0 hp/t. 5 forward gears, 5 reverse. 2400 rpm. Does not have neutral steering.
Leopard 1: 830hp, 40 tons. 20.8 hp/t. 8 forward gears, 4 reverse. 2200 rpm. Has neutral steering.
Leopard is slightly more mobile forward, AMX is better in reverse. Leopard has neutral steering as well.
It is inconsistent. Sometimes it works perfectly, other times it fails. I’ve overpressured Marders and BMPs easily, but then a fail to overpressure on a direct hit to a Fox.
Overall, I’d much rather have APDS than HEAT. It just works better.
True, I forgot about that.
What do you mean by this?
its not that bad for its br. You can play it as a light tank and have an easy enough time. I would just recommend sniping with it and since you are fast, move around a bit. Definitely not the best tank at 8.0 tho…
Wow, a statcarder. Impressive. Now let’s see Paul Allen’s statcard. Experienced players will tell you the stat card does not tell the entire story. Nowhere near.
What do you want from me? I have provided direct evidence of my claim, you seem to be implying you’re going off “feeling”
Actually, you provided no evidence. All you’ve shown is the stat card. Nothing about how it actually does in game.
Yes, you’re right. The Abrams clearly had a weaker engine than a Panzer II, because stat cards can’t be used as evidence.
I see this Racist comment from time to time from people that do not even know History…
Since France never surrendered in the first place…
So… Do not insult our community again…
And make sure to READ our EULA / ToS that you have signed and agreed with before posting again…
This Thread will remain Civilized… Back on topic… Thanks!
Because to overpressure a vehicle, the explosive needs to penetrate the armor.
Marder and BMP have some very thin armor plates here and there, particular on the top, while the Fox Aluminum Alloy 7039 has an armor modifier of 0.5, giving it 16-20mm of armor all around, which can’t be penetrated by 1kg of explosive.
The HE shell with 2kg of explosive will overpressure it all the time, in comparison.
APDS shadders very often, if I try to shoot any T-55 or T-55AMD.
Good day everyone. Decide, after a huge pause, to return to the game, upgrade the ground equipment for the planes that you once pumped out. And then I ran into a problem with the German “fork” at 8.0. So far I have found playable ones - Raketenavtomat (you need a skill for quickly getting into range, the maps are already very large) and Marder (sometimes a wiesel under a thermal imager to kill light vehicles in a dense forest.
There the problem is not so much in the weak leopard, as in raising the rating for many of his opponents - such as t55A, 59d1, lkv91-105. These tanks should not be matched at all with tanks without a Laser Rangefinder or shells with poor ballistics and problematic penetration. Their place is 9.0+
At one time (I’ve been playing since the Closed Beta Test), our disputes about technology reached the point of direct communication with the GM of this game in voice chats. Therefore, we must demand here!! from the rebalance developers! They make contact, believe me.
At the moment, Leo only plays well against 8 - 8.3. Above that, he is not playable even from the 3rd line.
Demand a rebalance for the German fork, otherwise it won’t work here. Here the tanks are balanced for marketing as well, for new players and countries. This is such a game. You have to fight for yourself!
However, you can’t do that without decompression, sadly. I hope Gaijin will decompress ground at some point soon.
It just gets to the point where you don’t even have time to occupy a point on the red line, and upon arrival, the Leopard is forced into a firefight from long distances with zeroing. This can be overcome with a super skill, unfortunately I don’t have that, I can’t immediately give cumulatively per move per kilometer for obstacles (stable). This only works for a static target. If it is on the move for 1 km+, then it is already very difficult to get in with binoculars.