actually a problem i just realized with reducing the br of the leclercs it would make the samp t not have a line up
Leclerc can use a little love, but they are fine at 12.7
adding more modern rounds to the azur might justify it for 12.7 and the rest can go down
i don’t think so
the 5 sec reload is all they have and the abrams, merkava and challenger can tie it and the type 90 has a better reload
Yea until their loader gets killed and then you are up for fun.
Or the Challenger uses up it’s 4 shells in the ready rack.
And type 90 is even a bigger glass cannon.
yes but the type 90 is faster, has a way better round and a 4 sec reload
also the lecerc can also be shot and damaged?
Im done here, you are right, Leclerc bad.
sorry for being stubborn but this is what i think
the challenger is even worse in my opinion btw
edit: i don’t mean to say that the lecerc is bad i just don’t think it is good enough to be 12.7 it’s still good
The Leclerc should actually have a top speed of 90km and have its hyperbar system added.
and now want to see leopard 2 A6 and pso armor value pleaase
Leclerc is good wherever he is, he’s highly versatile and can play various roles thanks to his mobility and reload speed, quick attacks, can defend one point and switch to another quickly, a good sniper, good in close-range combat. What can hinder him are only the terrible map designs we have.
it’s a good tank but not as good as other 12.7 tanks because of it horrible survivability
is my opinion
what is a hyperbar?
Yes, that can sometimes be your Achilles’ heel, but the trick is to avoid putting yourself in risky situations. I even found its survivability better than the Type 90’s, for example. I don’t know about the Type 10, but I’m close to getting it. Leclerc’s turret can also do some hulldown, although not reliably, but sometimes it works.
What you are saying is basicly just not get hit
But the type 10 can also do that just as good if not better
Well the ofl 120 F2 is just an ofl 120 F1 with “uranium appauvri”, the good shell to recieve as an apfsds-t would be the ofle 120 F2 or the shard.
1 Like
That and basically being an m1a1aim with comparable armor for the hull (at least front), comparable ammo, both gen 2 or 3 commander and gunner thermals at least for the leclerc SXXI (all the other leclercs dont get commander thermals), same turret traverse and vertical gun elevation speed and same max elevation/depression. Both have 5 second reload as max
But the leclerc got significantly worse turret armor (from the front at least) with a breach thats even bigger than the abrams. But it is 12.7 instead of 12.0 where the aim sits.
If anyone could explain to me what the leclerc does so much better to be 0.7 br higher while having worse armor (apart from max reverse speed, having an autoloader and no modelled turret basket yet) I’m all ears.
EDIT: actually i was even wrong about the comparable hull armor since the lower front plate of the leclerc has an insane amount of 70 mm armor and can get penned with crew loss by the chaffee, while the m1a1 has upwards of 400 mm against apfsds (just to compare the 2 areas of both tanks) all over the lfp…
did you get an expert crew M1A1 or is it still aced?
technically true
but most dont because the average player in any of these does not have ace crew (a lot of players dont even have expert crews), whereas the leclerc gets that reload on a level one crew, and you dont need to invest anything to be able to have that reload
1 Like
Iirc that is still aced.