+1
2 Likes
+1
2 Likes
+1 China has a gap between the Tor and the PGZ that this will help fill very nicely. Fortifying existing lineups with anti-aircraft utilities such as this one is essential.
3 Likes
Only stupid people will vote no. This and also the PGL-12 are much needed anti airs to clear the skies from planes. I suggest putting this to 9.0 br.
2 Likes
+1
2 Likes
+1 from me, also what about the ammo of the cannon? i readed somewhere that there are proxy rounds for the 35mm cannon (the pgz09 can also use them but aren’t in game for balancing reasons ig)
2 Likes
It could receive all normal shells in game, but also multiple Chinese domestic made rounds, and yes I believe proxy should be one of them
1 Like
if gaijin decides to add proxy rounds it would be good to have this thing at 10.7, while the yi tian at 10.0.?
1 Like
I think that would make the most since, but also hard to sya what gajjin will do
1 Like
This is beautiful. I’ve looked at it for five hours now. +1
1 Like
+1
The fact that my nation’s top tier SPAA is the Tor-M1 is disgusting(im ok with the tor in the chinese TT, just we dont have enough chinese modern SPAAs)
4 Likes
As for the fate of PGL-12 in PLA service, it seems it has lost to the Type 625 SPAA and was never seen again after a few trial use.
+1 SWS-2 is (well, now was) my favorite chinese light tank/spaa, knowing that there is an upgrade of it with 2 more ty90s is good to know :)
1 Like
PGZ09 should have AHEAD ammo, not proxy, but time fuse with programing to make it act like proxy
AHEAD can only be programmed with a special muzzle device, which can be seen on the end of the PGZ09’s gun barrells. The same device is on the Puma, which is the only other vehicle ingame capable of shooting AHEAD
If the missiles are indeed TY-90s, then it could be 10.3-10.7 even since their range and maneuverability can exceed most other MANPAD-type missiles in WT.
+1
1 Like
It will fill the gap, +1
1 Like
sws-2 has a vertical guidance of nearly 90° for both gun and missiles, LD-35 can probably do the same.
1 Like
It’s quite the conundrum to find the most accurate designation for this vehicle.
I always went with “SWS-2”.
The same thing applies to the CS/SA5, as it appears that it could be 3 different vehicles (all sharing the same turret).
Still, easily one of my most anticipated Chinese vehicles and an obvious +1 from me.
All SPAA gets an automatic yes from me.