You were the one to comment that the PBV 301 could be 8.0 in historical matchmaking, so idk.
There are ways to balance the historical matchmaking, like they did in the Normandy landing event, they limited the amount of players on the ‘stronger’ side, which I thought was very cool.
You can’t see any issues with WW2 vehicles getting donked on by 1960’s vehicles?
It isn’t an issue when those 1960s vehicles aren’t any better than WWII vehicles.
The 1954 EBR is 6.7 and balanced despite being 10 years newer than many of the tanks it faces.
This gif should hopefully help you visualize my feelings towards you and this thread
but the m-51 penetrates his tiger 2 frontally :( (ignore everything else about it)
If they have cold war munitions, they are not balanced in a WW2 setting. There can’t be logic behind your reasoning.
It was a comment on how stupid historical matchmaking is, not a legitimate game suggestion ffs…
Yeah, because having a compressed TT without having historical MM sure is the best solution, right?
The EBR does not have Cold War munitions, same with the AMX-13s.
The first amx-13 uses the same 75mm as the Sherman’s, and the later ones and the EBR use a 75mm cannon with average pen for its BR.
The key to solving balance is decompression. Historical MM will just be worse for everything. It won’t be balanced, and it will screw over many vehicles.
It just wouldn’t work in an RB setting.
Obviously the only way to fix war thunder is to send the sakeen to 7.0 because it’s from 1946
Naturally, also love your name btw
My mistake, but it does have an autoloader. Which sure isn’t very WW2 era.
Obviously, put 2s38 in 5.0, it’s weak in 10.0
He was talking about dates it was made, not it being over powered or under powered
ty :)
np
why? We’re balancing on vehicle dates of introduction in historical matchmaking, not equipment.
IS-7 and the Object 279 as well, clearly they are ww2 material. Hell, the IS-7 was designed in 1945 as well.
Ok so I guess the Hs129 B-3 is not WW2 era?
(If you couldn’t tell, autoloaders were a thing even in WW2).
I thought you were serios with this for a second, then I had to read to what you responded to lol