L-39ZA Albatross need br up and not in 6.3 br

The Cold War jet L-39ZA Albatros is even worst then Yak-9K because he has more speed then standard CAS from other nations and destroy every ground verhicle in 6.0 -7.3br and fighters it face. I don’t undertand a Cold War jet introduced in 1980 facing WW2 verhicles. Spaa don’t work against fast jets like L-39ZA Albatross unles you have 7.3 spaa with radar every spaa without radar is having problem to shot it down.

Don’t we just miss the days when people used to complain about RP-3 ( ungided rockets ) were a pain in the arse. Now GJ is adding stuff that simply doesn’t make any sense from a game play standpoint.

6.0~7.7 is absolute CAS hell, the experience is simply horrible until proper radar SPAAs are around.
If you don’t want to suffer you have to play higher

1 Like

In 6.7-7.7 you still make a change with spaa but against CAS like L-39ZA Albatross is another lvl you are facing with spaa.

More nations need more SPAA in that BR range, will help a bit.
USA 5.7- 7.0
UK 5.7 - 8.0 (Falcon should be moved to 8.0 now it has no APDS round)
Japan 5.7 - 7.0
China 6.7 - 7.3
Italy 6.3 - 7.7 (ZSU-57-2 is not a credible SPAA its far more effective as a TD)
France 6.7 - 8.3 (AMX-30 DCA should be put back to 8.3 now it has no APDS round)
Sweden 5.7 - 7.3
Isreal 4.7 - 7.0
So many massive BR gaps that planes can exploit which makes good strike planes in this BR much stronger ie MB-326s, L39s, all American strike planes around this BR ect…

1 Like

Unguided rockets used to have a way easier predictable ballistics, just saying.

L-39ZA Albatros playstyle is the same as the Yak-9K instead using cannon you fire unguided rockets and nobody is going aiming with machinegun at the sky when you are fighting against tanks atm and spaa lacks the dps to shot it down without radar.