Kings of Battle - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 2)

[AlvisWisla]

Consistent standards aren’t double standards.
If you’re allegedly against double standards then you agree with me.

[Shay]

He is not. People stop twisting his words to suit your side of the argument.

[lxtav]

@AlvisWisla

Britain & South Africa have production vehicles, no prototypes necessary, and definitely no paper necessary.

I would like to draw your attention to this, russia has no need for the yak 141, all its roles, exept for vtol ability, is filled by the mig 29

[Mytho-GR1]

Do you know how to follow a conversation

[lxtav]

Explain how i warped what you said?

[Shay]

It has everything to do with it, but okay. Also, please stop just taking what others are saying and putting them in your comments.

[Shay]

Russia also has production equivalents of the Yak-141, and according to your logic, because it does, the Yak-141 should not be added to the game. That is the point.

[AlvisWisla]

Prototypes should stay & be added.

[lxtav]

Can you quote this thing i said?

Surely if i said them then thats no bother?

[Shay]

Please point me to where I explicitly stated that it should be removed.

[Deathmisser]

The RNZAF F-16 was denied to Britain as it wasn’t in service there for the Yak 141 should be removed as it wasn’t sent to any other Russian airforce squadron nor was it in production

[lxtav]

@Mysto_

Russia also has production equivalents of the Yak-141, and according to your logic, because it does, the Yak-141 should not be added to the game. That is the point.

Full quote btw @AlvisWisla

[Shay]

He claims others are twisting his words and then does it right in front of everyone to something I said.

[lxtav]

He litterally said because of YOUR logic that other nations have production equivelents that the yak 141 shouldnt be added

[AlvisWisla]

@lxtav
No, my logic is that prototypes should stay & be added.
Me from 2015 - present: “Prototypes should stay & be added.”

[Mytho-GR1]

@AlvisWisla

production vehicles, no prototypes necessary, and definitely no paper necessary

This what they are on about replace britain with russia and ta da no yak141

[XSpaz1NOuTX-psn]

Im just catching up why should prototpyes not be added?

[lxtav]

@AlvisWisla

Britain & South Africa have production vehicles, no prototypes necessary, and definitely no paper necessary.

You said this, this is the full section of your post in wich you said

@AlvisWisla

Gaijin: “Gripen C is coming this year.”
South Africa & Hungary are in War Thunder now.
Potential for Gripen in non-Sweden tech trees as well.
The funnis: “Britain can get F-111, Gripen D, Sea Harrier 2, etc. only one of which would be 12.0+, the Gripen D; and the others aren’t good enough vehicles.”

Ya’ll are weird begging for “non-good” vehicles, including ones Britain nor South Africa used, when there are production alternatives that are superior.

@hjnbnb Yak-141 is a real prototype, just like Kikka, VB1002, J7W1, Swift F7, Ho229, XP50…

@Texas_Engineer_Mike
Britain & South Africa have production vehicles, no prototypes necessary, and definitely no paper necessary.

This

[XSpaz1NOuTX-psn]

Also you lot are talking a TON this patch

[Shay]

I can’t speak for Ixtav, but I believe that prototypes should be added, as they add more variety to the game. You said that Britain shouldn’t get a prototype because it has a production equivalent. Russia has a production equivalent to the Yak-141. Now that I have spelled it out clearly for you, do you finally see the massive hole in your argument?