The density and obtuseness, my dudes.
1 Like
No im saying that if you say one nation cant get prototypes then other nations shouldnt either, im litterally going against double standards whereas you are trying to warp my words and lie your way to winning an argument
Consistent standards aren’t double standards.
If you’re allegedly against double standards then you agree with me.
He is not. People stop twisting his words to suit your side of the argument.
I would like to draw your attention to this, russia has no need for the yak 141, all its roles, exept for vtol ability, is filled by the mig 29
1 Like
Do you know how to follow a conversation
2 Likes
Explain how i warped what you said?
It has everything to do with it, but okay. Also, please stop just taking what others are saying and putting them in your comments.
Russia also has production equivalents of the Yak-141, and according to your logic, because it does, the Yak-141 should not be added to the game. That is the point.
Prototypes should stay & be added.
Can you quote this thing i said?
Surely if i said them then thats no bother?
Please point me to where I explicitly stated that it should be removed.
The RNZAF F-16 was denied to Britain as it wasn’t in service there for the Yak 141 should be removed as it wasn’t sent to any other Russian airforce squadron nor was it in production
He claims others are twisting his words and then does it right in front of everyone to something I said.
2 Likes
He litterally said because of YOUR logic that other nations have production equivelents that the yak 141 shouldnt be added
@lxtav
No, my logic is that prototypes should stay & be added.
Me from 2015 - present: “Prototypes should stay & be added.”
1 Like
This what they are on about replace britain with russia and ta da no yak141
Im just catching up why should prototpyes not be added?
You said this, this is the full section of your post in wich you said
This