yes but that would be too interesting for a second blog
I’d set that as a 4th blog or as a blog before a pause like on a friday
That’s true.
Probably a low tier Japanese SPAA then
what im more scared of is the Leaks still being few
I dont think that means anything. Could mean an empty update or that its just full of super obvious stuff and nothing to make an exciting list over
i.e a british light tank thats a bit meh
yes that’s what I guessed
But could also be stuff alread “leaked” never know, they might do Fox 3 and Gripen this update.
or the big leak list from last update was intentionally made to find the spy among the devs and now they’ve been silenced
That is also entirely possible, though I dont think any dev company is truely leak proof.
I know a few that are, but they’re not in the gaming genre and rather in an Industrial setting
It was 1901 that Australia gained independence, actually.
If its to do with the internet… good luck :P
yea I guess
wrong thread to discuss the BR changes
4 Likes
There are other threads that have been created, but the best suggestion, as it appears you are focusing on a few specific examples, would be to create a dedicated, detailed thread, pertaining to those changes.
Hopefully we get some cool devblogs this week! Excited to see what drops tomorrow!
It’s really simple.
M1A1 AIM is built by US, used by US and a modified variant is sold to Australia.
India modified their T90s.
The only reason people make this to be more complicated than it seems is because it’s a US tank and they want different rules for US tanks.
The SK105 vs Skink issue, for example. The French absolutely needed the SK105 because it uses a turret design based on French turrets. The US definitely didn’t need the Skink, despite being based on a US tank and used US built components.
Hunter F58 is a British aircraft, built in the Britain, used by the RAF (in fact several sold to the swiss were former RAF aircraft). it was then sold to the Swiss who made some modifications to it.
India may have modified their T-90s but still a T-90, by the rules of the M1A1 AIM and the Canadian leopard, should still have gone to the Soviet Tree.
The US did not use the M1A1 AIM that Australia Modified. They may have used the same tank, but specificlally giving them the Australian version was unncessary and created TT complication (not saying it had to come to the Britian TT) they could have just as easily recieved the US version
ah yes the US tank that was Modified and build by the Canadians
and I know tHe ShErMaN iS aMeRiCaN no the “Sherman” this thing is based on is a Canadian domestic Redesign
Thats a good point. If we start getting into the extreme overlaps then US AV-8B+ for the British TT? Its a British Jet the americans modified :P
It’s no more unnecessary than giving Germany the Leopard C2A.