And why actually? Did Britain sold it to Australia?
Did Britain sell India the T-90?
Did many agree on this decision?
Did many agree on the AIM?
Nope. But the point is
A) A vehicle goes to its logical home. Australia and Canada have thus far got a reasonable presence on the British TT already and the addition of South Africa and India (2 nations with pretty bad ties to the Britain) to the British TT via the Commonwealth. In which Australia and Canada are both members
For the record the whole, Commonwealth thing is a can of worms. Indian Pantsir, Cyprus Tor-M1, etc etc. you name it, it could come to Britain via the Commonwealth. Its a really really messy idea
B) Vehicles that have no direct home, go to the exporters tree. In this instance, the Hunter F58 should have gone to the British TT. Also why things like Argentinian vehicles are on the German tree and the explanation why Canadian Leopards on the German Tree and the Austrlaian Abrams is on the US tree.
Having it flip flop between these 2 rules just seems to end in only one way. Britain getting screwed somehow
6 Likes
The only ones that disagreed where British players because of their commonwealth which isn’t even in-game.
I have got no issues when it comes to indigenously build vehicles but you guys are essentially asking for vehicles you got no relation to and use small number of bad decisions to fit your narrative
No one is directly asking for these vehicles. (Okay a Canadian leopard migth be nice) but the point is about future additions.
having hard rules to stop bad placements happening in the future is needed.
The Hunter F58 has been something Britain has been asking for for a long time. It going to the German tree royally screwed over anyone wanting it in the British TT
1 Like
“You got no relation to”, Australia gained independence in 1986 and received the AIM a long time after, India gained independence in 1947, we have even less relation with them. This whole discussion is about consistancy.
Also in comparison. The Royal family is still head of state right? and politically and economically they are closer tied than either India and South Africa (and south africa has never been happy about being in the Commonwealth If I recall)
1 Like
Literally this
1 Like
If Britain should have gotten any Sub tree. Canada, Australia, New Zealand and 1 or 2 others, would have been 1000x better than SA. Even if they were still strictly speaking “commonwealth nations”
2 Likes
That’s why im okay with indigenous build vehicles in the British Tree like the ADATS.
The T-90 could have easily been the Arjun but it simple Gaijin bas decisioning.
But how do you define indigenous builds? Completely from scratch or just modified?
1 Like
If that’s the case playing it like how we did the Benelux would be best. With my bad research, Canada would most likely be the face, Australia the Sub tree and New Zealand there unofficially.
Completely from scratch. Modified vehicles if the UK assisted in this modification process.
I mean with relation in like connection to the M1A1 AIM.
What is that abomination!? I want it in the game.
pressurized cabin go brrrrr
so a new day arises
I bet 2 Bottlecaps and a sigular M5 Nut on Either Gnat or Boatblog today
Its been a few weeks since soviets got any additions, so I reckon Soviet T-90 or another Su-25