Canberras are British. Not American strictly speaking. AV-8C are British as well. The Harrier II could be considered half American. P-51 is also half american
1 Like
B3C is the JU-86,
Lightning: This contradicts the placement of other vehicles (Such as F.58)
Wirraway was based off of the Harvard, which contradicts the placement of JU-86, Boomerang was developed off of this, therefore follows the same story.
Beaufort/Beaufighter are correctly placed, that was my bad
Avenger Mk ii, Corsair Mk ii, Martlet, are all American vehicles USED by the British through lend lease, this contradicts that the P-39 is in the American tree, as it was never used for combat operations.
2 Likes
I’m a kiwi, I know stuff abt NZ, we used to have older aircraft, such as Wellington, and Spitfires (this is unique because our Spitfires tended to only have 2x Hispano, no MG.)
1 Like
Saudi Arabia, not Pakistan.
What about the ground? (apart from the bob simple) would you guys have enough to push Australian Tree(ANZAC) to have enough stuff all together?
No we wouldn’t, we’d only have Bob Semple and Schofield tank, but along with Australia we might be able to pump something out, it would only be small sub tree, like SA is ATM, unless Canada comes as well, and the rest of commonwealth
1 Like
I agree on the Wirraway it’s based upon an US design.
However if a country not in-game used these vehicles you build how makes no sense for it to be in your country which designed and build it?
According to you tons of vehicles in-game are placed “randomly”even when used by some countries represented in-game.
Where should we place the Leopard2A4/6CAN?
You’ve just landed on the exact debate/problem. Current placement is not consistant.
2 Likes
As Morvran_ said, it isn’t consistant, that’s what I’m getting at, vehicle placement often contradicts others. If M1A1 AIM is fine in America, why give T-90 to Britain? It would belong in Russia
2 Likes
Why Gaijin gave a T-90 to Britain? Many wonder however did many agree on this, nope.
This however are again small examples of Gaijin’s bad decisioning which again many disagreed on their tons of other vehicles which got placed logical.
Nice. The source mentioned this delegation, it even happened before relations were officially normalized in 1992. Nice photo.
1 Like
Canada by itself can be a small-medium tree with just domestic and modified added in the copy and paste the snail loves you get a medium-large.
The problem is that both nations would have two different play styles as domestic builds follow different paths and post-Centroun they when different ways for MBT. I find that both nations would offer different play styles hence why I want them as two separate nations.
Many sub trees have different playstyles to their main tree. I agree I would want seperate trees but there just isn’t enough for them to have seperate trees, like what would an ANZAC tree have for naval, there’s like 10 vehicles.
1 Like
And why actually? Did Britain sold it to Australia?
Did Britain sell India the T-90?
Did many agree on this decision?
Did many agree on the AIM?
Nope. But the point is
A) A vehicle goes to its logical home. Australia and Canada have thus far got a reasonable presence on the British TT already and the addition of South Africa and India (2 nations with pretty bad ties to the Britain) to the British TT via the Commonwealth. In which Australia and Canada are both members
For the record the whole, Commonwealth thing is a can of worms. Indian Pantsir, Cyprus Tor-M1, etc etc. you name it, it could come to Britain via the Commonwealth. Its a really really messy idea
B) Vehicles that have no direct home, go to the exporters tree. In this instance, the Hunter F58 should have gone to the British TT. Also why things like Argentinian vehicles are on the German tree and the explanation why Canadian Leopards on the German Tree and the Austrlaian Abrams is on the US tree.
Having it flip flop between these 2 rules just seems to end in only one way. Britain getting screwed somehow
6 Likes
The only ones that disagreed where British players because of their commonwealth which isn’t even in-game.
I have got no issues when it comes to indigenously build vehicles but you guys are essentially asking for vehicles you got no relation to and use small number of bad decisions to fit your narrative
No one is directly asking for these vehicles. (Okay a Canadian leopard migth be nice) but the point is about future additions.
having hard rules to stop bad placements happening in the future is needed.
The Hunter F58 has been something Britain has been asking for for a long time. It going to the German tree royally screwed over anyone wanting it in the British TT
1 Like