Kings of Battle - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 1)

I go with some random boat

Sniff sniff I smell something cooking

Doubt it lol

If Gripen is coming this update no doubt it will be a big part of the trailer. Would be strange for them to have the 2nd devblog reveal it already

2 Likes

It wont come this update but december

Didn’t the Finnish sub tree got released in the third devblog ?

It’s ether this or December.

There was quiet alot of ground vehicles in the last update so I guess this update maybe more forced on air. Since nations need to catch up with the Russians and the Americans

2 Likes

Even with all the ground vehicles the last update wasn’t light on air.

Hell most of this year has been air focused or at least air heavy.

2 Likes

We don’t know exactly when it will come, it’s 50/50

I guess it’s ether a late blog or it’s been cancelled for today

Show me the dev T- 90M Proryv3 and the next version object 2020 and I will be very satisfied too.

there will be no devblog on monday like always.

Forgetting Oxy has confirmed one and last update it started on a monday

That’s a thing?

It’s no way optimal lol.

US:F-16C Block50 get AIM-120 (Could possibly get AIM-120A/B but it simply doesn’t need them rn unless every nation has a equivalent fighter with FOX3 capability)
.
GR:new F-4F ICE get AIM-120 (Completely DoA with 4th gens getting ARH in the same update)
.
RU:MiG-29SMT / Yak-141 get R-77 (Early R-77 is AIM-120C equivalent. It’s too early for these high performing ARH missiles)
.
UK:new SAAF JAS39 get AIM-120 (It never had AIM-120 or AIM-9 missiles. The ones it carried are far too advanced)
.
JP:F-4EJK get AAM-4 (Completely unnecessary addition. You’re basically trying to kill this jet with these missiles. As of rn F-4EJ Kai is very strong in BVR while in WVR it’s lacking. AAM-4 would only move it higher to the point where its main advantage would vanish.)
.
CN:maybe J10A? (J10A early is actually not a bad idea) or J8F with PL12,actually that‘s old plane (PL-12 is AIM-120C equiavalent)
.
IT: new HuAF JAS39 get AIM-120 (Same as swedish one - only early AIM-120A/B unless air battles got a rework)(F-16A ADF : Maintain the status quo) (AIM-120 addition to ADFs would be completely unnecessary and not healthy. Except for Italian F-16 and Chinese MLU >both can be added as late variants if needed<)
.
FR:Mirage 2000-5F get MICA-IR / EM (MICA would be far too powerful currently, especially in IR variant. Again - AIM-120C equivalent)
.
SW:new JAS39 get AIM-120 (Only swedish variant tho >RB99< because later AMRAAMs would break the balance in current state of air battles)
.
IR:F-16D block40 get AIM-120 or Derby (Barak II can’t use AIM-120, only DERBY which would be better than early AIM-120. Barak II should get advanced IR missiles like Python 4 and no radar missiles at all)

Early ARH missiles on late 3rd gens at higher BRs is optimal and should be done in order to properly test these nimble FOX3s.

Nah we have had devblogs on monday. It’s just a bit more inconsistent than getting dev blogs on other days.

And some people are quick to jump to definitive conclusions based on little evidence.

1 Like

6 Likes

Saved me a job there m8

1 Like

i dont trust

insane