Kings of Battle - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 1)

Yak-141 was never put into production, thus it doesn’t have weapons exclusive to production aircraft.
Stop denying reality.

IRIS-T were used on Prototypes

DA1 even still has some on the rails while in the museum

could you give me the russian forum pls?

IRIS-T and Aim-9x represent a leap in capability for which the R-73M as far as i can tell is just not. They use annentirely new generation of seeker type for which the Soviets don’t have anything untill maybe R74M/2

Warthunder is as far as im concerned not ready for that new type of seeker. Iirc its FPA seekers

They’re comparable to the R-74M, not R-73M.

yes well then we should remove all weapons from the Yak 141 because those were only ever mocked up

You are misreading his comments.

How about read first

Show us the country that has Yak-141 in service.

Country of service is completely irrelevant, but okay.

It’s completely relevant.
Gaijin does not add weapons to prototypes of production vehicles, ever.

Show me a statement from Gaijin that says that.

1 Like

Here’s the real list: Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Jordan

India is not included here, due to the fact that on the broadcast the fool Bullanikov called it a colony

Spoiler

image

Canada can, as I have already said several times in different countries

They had their own option that they were considering, so it’s worth waiting for

Mysto do you understand that guy’s logic?

I don’t

So when did Gaijin confirm it directly?

Negative.

I have not seen anything to indicate the R74M, which seemingly still uses the old seeker type, is comperable to the IRIS-T. Hence me doing the “/2” As maybe the R74M2 might actually have an FPA seeker just because we know nothing about it.

Can I go back to sleep now lol

@someweirdname

Prototypes of production/service vehicles do not get service weapons in War Thunder.
There is no such example, and never will be.

yes, we will wake you when the Blog drops

1 Like

So where did Gaijin confirm that directly?