Any fake leak lists yet?
2 Likes
I wonder what tomorrow devblog will be about. I suspect a ship.
We had one saying Thai sub trees would come.
2 Likes
I think you are far too hopeful in your timeline for 4.5/4++ Jets. There are many facets of the game to be worked on, even if there is a separate production team for Naval, Ground forces are getting rank 8 soon. Game engine updates, new gamemodes, mechanics, will all take up so much time.
Heavy emphasis on new gamemodes and mechanics, as those areas will be pushed the hardest if we keep introducing higher and higher performance vehicles with the current game.
There is a considerable desire in the community to change mission types, or atleast spice things up again, and this can be seen by the countless youtube videos we have about top tier AIRRB.
Even if they don’t change anything, it takes AGES to make new Air RB maps with how large they have to be nowadays.
And always, we have to accept that Gaijin may just want to artificially slow down future content updates to extend the games update cycle. 10 Years going stronger than ever, but we can’t have an F22 by 2025 if we want this game to live.
2 Likes
We don’t need to worry about the gaps created by updating vehicles too quickly, because the new content of our game is not just vehicles.
New models, new systems, are the focus of the future, and the idea of just staying in new vehicles is too old.
We can expect more maps, more space, richer game modes, and we shouldn’t limit ourselves to grab point scramble, this pattern is too small.
We can also expect SPH, PZH2000, PLZ05, M109A6/7, B1 Centaurus 155, and many more, around drone reconnaissance, tactical maps, people in the loop missile，datalinks, and more，we will greatly expand the gameplay, instead of boxing around A B C today, which is too boring.
We can also expect infantry systems, let’s think about this year’s April Fool’s Day event, motorized infantry, behold, infantry-armored unit coordination, plus our masterpiece— flying vehicles, oh… Oh, OHHHH… This is great, if you can expand the number of players, such as 24 vs 24, bigger maps, more gameplay, it’s even more exciting than just getting new vehicles!!
Don’t forget, our WT used to have a “capture point capture and advance” mode, a total of 3 capture points, if we expand them, integrate my above ideas, and integrate the game ideas of “Battlefield” and “Enlisted”into WT, our game experience will become richer, which is much more meaningful than simply waiting for a simple vehicle.
It’s great to make WT a multi-mode, three-dimensional multi-service joint operations game with ground vehicles, flying vehicles, helicopters, and even infantry.
I’m not only an old WTer, but also a Battlefield fan, and I’d love to experience the same mode and experience as Battlefield in WT, with a bigger battlefield, more players competing on the same stage, and a more exciting game feeling, oh… If I could, I’d literally fly XDDDDDD
Hey, my favorite Gaijin, how about you think about that? @Smin1080p ：DDDDDDD
More gameplay, more potential players, more money, better future, fantastic
4 Likes
Well regardless of what happens, it would make sense that the Chinese get their Flankers when Russia receives them as well, like the F-16’s. If Russia gets Fox-3 flankers so would China, and if Russia gets a Su-30MK then so would China. I have a feeling that we’ll have too wait until December for Fox-3 capable planes, but we’ll see how Gajjin has this planned out. Either way I hope we get a new Chinese CAS jet this update
What the hell is this abomination
Yes.
Someone posted Thai stuff. All copy paste except for some subsonic modern light attacker.
1 Like
By this point any sub tree for japan is better then no tree tbh… 😊
4 Likes
Question for the Japan mains out there: what’s the most likely SPAA you’ll get for top tier?
We wont get one lol, Problem is more modern SPAA and SAM on the Japanese front require a duel system of the launcher and the target designator
Hopium Smin said NEW POWER
I mean I guess we could get a new missiles for the type 93? Type 91 Kai (SAM-2B).
probably type 93 stay there, and get a toyota with new Launcher and missile
ohno
Type 81 Surface-to-Air Missile
1 Like
Type 81C.
2 Likes
It has been confirmed that one it being worked on, so no, you are incorrect.
Both the Type 81 C and Type 11 of the JGSDF are confirmed to be able to operate on their own with a KCU device that, in my opinions, is no more of a stretch than the Soviet MLRS trucks getting adjustable suspension and operating the launcher from the cab. The only difference is that SAM is actually needed for a healthy game while these were not.
Additionally there is a Type 11 launcher mounted to a trailer that can in theory be towed by the FCS vehicle, if this is still too much of a stretch for Gaijin. I don’t have the image on hand but it is somewhere in the Type 11 thread.
2 Likes