Kings of Battle - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 1)

the funniest thing propably is the german leopard 2a4 with era lol, besides that i dont know the other stuff

1 Like

from this handsome guy

2 Likes

Part of a Polish Tree would be my guess

Well, politics aside, USSR would be the best fit

1 Like

tbh i feel like ukraine would fit as a whole new tech tree they actually have very unique tanks and a lot of them including some SPAA and even some low tier tanks

kill me but i wont stop hopping for the poland sub tree addition to germany, gotta gather all Panther tanks in 1 tech tree!!!

2 Likes

sadly in this case you cant seperate it as much as u would want

Hate the sideskirts. They flare out way too much on the sides, and then taper off in the back annoyingly too lmao. Otherwise it seems fine.

1 Like

logically it would look like it is but ussr its so filled with tanks that rn i dont see it fitting to add a sub tech tree

From what I understand, Ukraine was the USSRs main weapon producer. So most of the USSR vehicles we’ve got are essnetially Ukrainian versions. Or something akin to that

ukraine is too touchy

BTR-4 would go well with Zhalo and other wheeled tanks to round out the wheeled tree, T-64BV and T-84 would be great to add some more depth between T-64B and T-80U/BVM. Not sure the helicopters are anything that different from the USSR/Russia ones.

Currently an entirely new tech tree wouldnt make much sense, no matter how many vehicles you could list for that tree. We have too many neglected trees already

@dellstroy besides that with ukraine we gotta draw a line for a tree they would only allowed to get vehicles pre current situation and post after situation else we end up with a tree with arbams, challenger , leopards, cvs, etc this includes unique stuff like the era leopards.

It ends horrible if a tree literaly would get everything

These are two layers era Duplet

3 Likes

u dont know gajin very well do you lol

KhTZ did a lot of truck and tank manufacturing and design, motor-sich is responsible for a lot of helicopter engines, and most MiG’s had a few production factories in Ukraine. A LOT of MiG-23’s for example, were assembled there. Antonov transport planes too. I’ve heard some say the Stugna is a successor to most Russian ATGM’s in design theory, as allegedly (I’m sure it’s right) they had a hand in a lot of the ATGM development.

But they weren’t the only Republic in the USSR to be developing weapons. Russia did most of it overall.

2 Likes

you are right since most of weapon production factories were in ukraine, in fact the main factory for producing T80’s its in ukraine and funny enough they are the only ones with the blueprints for the T80 appart from russia but since the main factory its in ukraine they have better tools for producing T80’s

1 Like

Doesn’t change the fact it’s super ugly, imo.

1 Like

I know they seem to love money judging by certain balancing decisions regarding premium vehicles
Would a ukraine tech tree make them loads of money?