Did I ever once state that AAs aren’t underperforming?
you asked “How so?” so I mentioned somewhere you can find out
You didn’t give me one singular answer to the question of “how so”, simply pointing your finger and deflecting over to the ADATS doesn’t answer how it’s worse than it is IRL.
there are like 5-10 different major things mentioned there, do you really expect me to accurately list them?
Yes? You’re the one that mentioned it out of place, so what about it is underperforming in relation to real life?
incorrect radar elevation in game it is 18, irl up to 72 depending on conditions and target range
in game lacking ability to que targets to irst from the radar despite being IRL feature
missile velocity+agility less than IRL
IRST missing adverse weather capability, and range is too low in game
TWS tracking of up to 20 targets IRL
Sight elevation limited to 60 degrees in game while ILR could go past vertical
Sight missing stabalization
Thermal sight resolution too low in game
IRL it could tell where its missile was after the motor burned out
inability to effectively intercept munitions in game where it was confirmed and tested to be able to irl
and more
1 Like
According to?
Do you mean being able to lock onto people via IRST based on their radar return?
Welcome to poor implementation of every SPAA in the game! Anything with radar and IRST as the sole locking feature is unable to slew via radar, from the CV9040 to even the Soviet SPAA.
According to?
As is everything else in the game. Welcome to engine limitations and poor implementation.
It has TWS. It sort of came with its optical tracking.
Are you talking the sim sights or gun-attached sight?
Still sim sights?
According to?
So… Datalink?
According to?
It’s more than capable of intercepting Kh-38Ms, Vikhrs, Kedges, and Karens.
all of these are answered in the thread I mentioned
stop trying to derail this thread
1 Like
You didn’t link a thread.
Are you not the one that just derailed the thread by accusing me of having an entirely fictitious viewpoint?
Are you lost? Genuinely, I think you need some help.
because you dont know how to search stuff
1 Like
No
Well, yes but no. It was by no means provided to the crew
Not when you say “that one thread where the thing is mentioned”, though I still wouldn’t take that thread with a granule of salt.
Even with that as your backing, you still misstated and even downright missed the target on some of your points.
At most you get time to target… Unless it somehow has datalink as a beamriding system and just so happened to never mention it
No. It was used internally by the system for the coded laser telescope. Was it measured by LRF, was it time based. Idk.
1 Like
Not that type. 20 targets (10 on the US ADATS) were TWS by the radar.
1 Like
We must be using different ADATS, I can watch as the SU30/34 ripples off KH38m’s and turns back for base before ever being within my range. Then I have 6 Kh to deal with that I can barely find and if I manage to get a lock on one I loose it instantly.
Best case I can save myself whilst watching my teammates get obliterated and leave the game early.
I know what you mean. There’s currently nothing you can do. Only SPAA which might have the range is also on russian side and keep air space clear for KH-38 jets.
Classic German player, go to the corner of the map with spawn and complain about attack aircraft.
Alpharius, this topic is about Kh-38 not ADATS, and you’re accusing the other party of attempting to derail the topic.
Being correct about ADATS’ elevation doesn’t mean others are being mean.
Foxxo’s a sincere dude.
you mean without the use of jets?