JGSDF Discussion Page

I arrived very late to the party about STA4 but I have some information that I feel it would be nice to share, so anyway I have this old tank magazine from Japan which goes into detail about the development of the Type 61:

and it has a section dedicated to describe each prototype and requirement by the JGSDF that led to the development of the final design:

but the whole point of my response is to ask if anyone knows about the information of these charts which has information about the STA4 and Type 61 engine performance:

so my question is about, does this slight difference in performance is something considerable in order to introduce it to WT as the last prototype of the Type 61? or the information is wrong and it had the same performance as the regular Type 61, I couldn’t find info about this so that’s why I post it here because I know there’s people here who can provide more feedback

10 Likes

Type 99 SPH coming

2 Likes

In Russian stream was showed the spall liner as new part of armor.
Do somebody knows what Japanese vehicles had spall liner?

I found only something for WW2 vehicles like Chi-Ha and etc

Spoiler

Only Russian vehicles get theirs modelled. All Nato MBTs have them but none got them modelled.

That’s why I really want to see some information about it.
Especially Japanese vehicles is interesting

That will me unfair advantage against glorious soviet vehicles

Can’t wait for this beauty

4 Likes

image
Type 89 and Type 99 should use the same transmission, but the Type 89 has 9 forward and 4 backward gears, while the Type 99 has 8 forward and 2 backward gears. This is very strange.

4 Likes

WHERE NO WAY?!?!?!

I missed the dev stream :(

Apparently the optical seeker mode has been nerf can see flares now or something.
image

Bruh. Ain’t the whole point of optical mode to avoid seeing them or something?

Optical mode implementation is based on old soviet optical missile and it was shit at very least
And everyone else getting the same treatment because that missiles 50 years ago was bad

Yeah…i guess well see if that is true i haven’t been able to test anything yet.

anyone wanna back me up? I need better sources

1 Like


Wiki may be wrong unless these two aren’t the N1K2 Type 21a.

The setup in the photos only allows 2x 250kg or 4x 60kg.

Any information on the muzzle velocity of the Type 99 SPH? i find it hard to believe that it fires the same rounds at the same velocity as the Type 75 SPH despite the barrel length being over a third longer.

The range on the sources say its capable of firing much further at least so why would the velocity be the same?

its not ready yet its supossed to get a new ammo i hope it gets type 03 tbh

it is currently an EXACT copy of the type 75 down to number of rounds, transmission, engine, weight ect, don’t expect thse to be final

yeah as of rn its missing everything pretty much

I’ve come back with some hope, there may be some info about it here if you can find a PDF.

I don’t know if it’s the same manual you can find on the national archive website but it’s worth a shot.