76.2mm M32
M339 APBC (6.6kg at 975m/s)
Penetration:
204mm @ 0m at 0 °
82mm @ 0m at 60 °
90mm Type 61
M318A1 APBC (10.91kg at 914m/s)
222mm @ 0m at 0 °
88mm @ 0m at 60 °
1 Like
This is also off topic, but there is no JASDF topic page so I’ll just post it here. The T-2 (and the premium one) is getting AIM-9P.
1 Like
T-2 Early - 9.7 (2x AIM-9E)
T-2 - 10.0 (2x AIM-9J)
F-1 - 10.7 (4x AIM-9L)
Is how it should be
3 Likes
No. F-1 even with AIM-9L on 10.7 would be just a fish food, without chaffs/flares, with poor maneurability and no radar missles (so in uptiers it will suffer much more, than now.)
Same goes to T-2. Unless it receives 9L, it cant go higher, than 9.7
1 Like
Yea, I’m not sure why people think F-1 should move up if it gets 9Ls?
It is already poorly balanced due to lack of flares and the 9Ls would balance them a bit giving them a good offense to counter their poor defense. Eventually adding chaff pods would probably also help them too as they could fly a bit higher and have better chance against early radar missiles.
5 Likes
At the same time I disagree with AIM-9L’s meeting 9.3 stuff
The next update will add nets to the lights on Type 10 tanks.
Very good. :)
11 Likes
most stuff japan has recieved till now “nets on their lights” wich will add a total of 0.01 mm of armor protection
Net will be able to repel APFSDS
2 Likes
imgaine they actually turn the armor upside down and reverse it so now its fixed
Oh nice!
I hope they add the mini-basket at the back of the turret sometime too.
2 Likes
one of my top best suggestions that I saw in the forum for japan rn its prob the suggestion of adding the type 91 kai missile for the type 93 and change the main tracking system of the type 91 from IR tracking to optical tracking with IR assistance which means it can lock at any range and fire without too much troubles meanwhile type 91 kai would have more G forces and better range which could be a great addition for the type 93, also ECCM seems to be useless so far since it should be immune to ircms thanks the this ECCM but unfortunately it isn’t
3 Likes
But kai variant don’t have more G, its only have smokeless motor and IIR instead of optical, which means its less visible, better seeker for bad weather and vulnerable to DIRCM, while basic variant should have resistance
1 Like
i know it dosent have extra G forces since the only thing it changes is that its technically lighter due to the reduction of the electronics but it still keeps the same weight due to the addition of extra fuel for the missile so it has more range, but this could easily be an artifical buff to the missile so there is a reason to actually grind the type 91 kai appart from the range, Hronomant even made very nice estimations and calculus of the type 91 missile G forces but we know that it probably wont be added as 30 g forces since gaijin needs proof other than videos
Would be better to remove all artificial nerfs, type93 have about 50% less irl combat capabilities compared to what we have in game, not even talking about bugs
1 Like
ik but some times like in this case is needed, if not you would see a lot of people crying about how op the type 93 is and well it is right imagine a missile that can hit you at 12 km with ease insane tracking system and inmmune to flares ircm and cannot be out turned
I don’t mind it being 10.0-11.0 with proper stats. better then bs we have right now
1 Like
tbh yeah tho i wont lie its stil a very fun vehicle to get cas users mad
The only thing bugging me out is the low range against helicopters, you can’t even fight Mi-4s reliably since you can’t get a lock while they are already in range
that’s because their IR signature apparently its lower than those of planes but since irl it uses optical tracking it shouldnt really matter