Japan Su-27

The TNI-AU Su-27SK is already featured ingame as a camouflage for the Su-27 (USSR).
And there’s no reason adding only one Su-27 from the TNI-AU to Japan - either add an entire Indonesian line or add nothing from them.

I suppose no sane man would want a premium/event Indonesian opreated Soviet designed aircraft for Japan tree in the forseeable future.

1 Like

We had a single British bulit aircraft operated by Swiss air force as a squadron vehicle of Germany.
So a single Indonesia SU-27 for Japan is nothing special.

3 Likes

Does Indonesia use Japanese as their official language and having cultural/geographical connection with it?
Does Switzerland use German as their official language and having cultural/geographical connection with it?

The Swede Mi-28, F-16AJ and German Hunters are already setting bad examples of frankensteining tech trees and I do not wish to see more tech tree getting frankensteinized without proper excuse and in this case I have not found any proper excuse for adding a Su-27 to Japan while they have other more sensible candidates.

1 Like

I think you get me wrong.
First, I am no saying the Indonesia SU-27 is needed for the Japanese tree. I mean if Gaijin do want a SU-27 in Japanese tree, the Indonesia one make more sense than the Japanese one.
Second, the Germany Hunter case is just saying that single minor nation vehicle can introduce to the game without introduceing entire subtree.

3 Likes

During World War II, the Empire of Japan expelled the local Dutch army, and Indonesia became a colony of the Empire of Japan. After World War II, the Imperial Japanese Army stationed in Indonesia participated in the Indonesian War of Independence and expelled the Dutch army from Indonesia.
In modern times, Japan has concluded the ``防衛装備品・技術移転協定’’ and has deep ties in military technology.
In addition, Japan regularly cooperates and provides guidance to the Indonesian Coast Guard, and sells a large number of patrol vessels as a special exception, which would otherwise be prohibited.
It is not determined solely by cultural, geographical, or linguistic connections.
Determined based on various factors.

7 Likes

except it wasnt top tier and not game deciding

1 Like

you already got the F(ake)-16AJ, not sure you need more fake stuff

3 Likes

Yes, indeed the Japanese Su-27 does not exist.
But look again.
Instead of the Japanese Su-27, two other options have been presented as alternatives, including the Indonesian Su-27.
I don’t know about the F-16AJ, but there is a Thai F-16 instead.

this has to be a joke no way this guy is serious

5 Likes

i see your point. however would you rather have an F-16 that has AESA instead at the same BR?

We were forced to get ‘promoted’ Japanese F-16, and now we have a suggestion on ‘considered’ Su-27. I’d guess next one would be an ‘imagined’ RX-78-2.

2 Likes

According to your theory, south korea should get…

Well for that to happen South Korea should first get a tech tree.

No, please NO

4 Likes

Why are there so many absurd proposals like this only in Japan TT?

Stop whining that Japan lacks air-to-ground capabilities.

Wrong plane likes the F-16AJ should no longer be produced.

7 Likes

Please do not base your comments on topic names or things you have only slightly read.
Overall, it presents two alternatives to Japan’s Su-27, including Indonesia.
Japan’s Su-27 is a paper airplane like the F-16AJ, but other proposals are different. These two options are real, not paper airplanes.
At least one of them, Indonesia, could also serve as an option to add to the game.

First of all, adding Su-27 to Japan TT is a story of complete creation, so it is absolutely not valid.
Next, the addition of Indonesia’s Su-27 to JASDFTT can’t be further explained why.
If it makes sense to add Indonesia’s Su-27 to Japan’s TT because the Japanese army took control of Indonesia during World War II, then France was also taken over by Germany during World War II, so the French equipment should be on the German TT.
So the argument is ridiculous…

4 Likes

The frequent and unreasonable proposals are partly the fault of gaijin, which has been implementing fictitious or almost irrelevant national aircraft and vehicles, leaving the standards vague and interpreting them as conveniently as possible from time to time. I have a suggestion. Rather than confuse TT further with fictitious aircraft and sub-trees, why don’t you just insist that the “national tree system should be stopped”? The main reason for proposing to implement the Su-27 in the Japanese TT is that it is too much work and time consuming to start from scratch with the Soviet TT, isn’t that problem solved if the F-4EJkai can directly grind the Su-27 and F-16C?

1 Like


If Japan Succeeds in grabbing Su-27 like this.
What will be next to Japan Tech Tree…?
How about F-15J Kai(改) Eagle plus from Patlabor 2?

Not a surprise that Japan Tech Tree got their own fake F-16J in the ‘Sky Guardians’ update.

No more fake paper planes in Japan tech tree. we had enough of nonsense fake planes like R2Y2 Keiun Kai or F-16AJ.

2 Likes

Who is this monster…?
Replacements for the Keiun Kai series are also being considered, but although replacements exist, no progress has been made and the plan is expected to be put on hold for the time being.


By the way, this was last May.

Replacements for the Keiun Kai series are also being considered, but although replacements exist, no progress has been made and the plan is expected to be put on hold for the time being.

As long as Gaijin didn’t bring Keiun Kai’s replacement. it is just another check that can’t be cashed.
Just like ‘Not Virtual but Real Cockpits for Bomber’ in 2013 Cockpits for bombers: work in progress!