You being personally bad at using the JA37C doesn’t mean you’re right, it just means you’re personally bad at using the JA37C.
Also btw you don’t even have the Viggen, I mean I guess you could test drive the Di and then claim bias but your highest BR aircraft is a event vehicle F-5.
1 Like
Please, oh master of the universe, enlighten us. How do YOU personally play the Viggen, be sure to send clips too of your amazing games in it, or at least leave us the replays.
So are you going to post proof or is this another situation where you claim something then proceed to scream and cope because you refuse to show proof.
Also again if you’ve played it why not show some evidence of it in your hanger or you playing it in a match?
Oh wait you can’t, well I mean unless you wanna buy the Di which won’t work for this argument anyways since that’s not the C model lol
I’m not breaking any rules lol keep flagging my posts, you’re only here to cause a ruckus
Better question, how do YOU play it? It’s very hard to imagine you as any other than that one guy who crashes at the start of every match if you seriously think DF Sparrows with PD radar is bad for 11.3.
Still waiting on that clip btw for your RB24 claim? Oh wait you don’t play Sweden outside of low tier or squadron/event vehicles that’s right
Why ignore me btw? Why only target others?
Yes keep flagging me because you’re here to just lie and cause a problem rather than contributing to the post
1 Like
No, I never said the Viggen was bad. I said it was fine and yes, it is strong. I have dropped 5 aces in it and even a 7 kill game in it. I’m damn good at using that plane. My KD is above 2. I know how to play it
So are you going to stop spouting nonsense about a vehicle you haven’t played or are you going to keep digging your own grave by showing a complete lack of ability to counter 2 SARH missiles? Because this is embarrassing on your half to read you trying to explain how the Viggen needs to go up.
Did he say it was bad right there? I think most of us think the missiles and PD are fine the problem is the chassis and all its downsides but you wouldn’t have any experience with that would you?
1 Like
The more you talk about how good your stats are, and how you’re so much better of a player than everyone else, the more I think you just farm ai units all game in the hopes of convincing people you have any amount of credibility.
You have given 0 reasons or backing for any of your points. So far, the closest you have come to an “argument”, if you can call it that, is just saying ur bad and can’t counter two SAHR missiles!
1 Like
Really? You’re gonna flag my posts? So you lie about me saying things, lie about playing vehicles and yet you want anyone to take your opinion about vehicles seriously? You’re a joke bigger than Tiger Tank
2 Likes
Because you truthfully can’t. If you genuinely think that 2 7E-2’s are too strong at 11.3, you have a skill issue, through and through.
And if I can look back, I’ll try to find a screenshot I took of the post game rewards for the 7 kill game. but it was a year or so ago.
Ironic talking about lack of argument, when you haven’t given a single reason behind the Viggen needing to go up….
1 Like
PD radar and Aim-7E-2.
I already brought it up, you just chose to ignore it cause you don’t have any reasoning as to how it’s fitting for 11.3. Primarily cause there is no reason.
The JA37C is very good at 11.3, and it could certainly go up to 11.7 without being completely obliterated. But I do not think it’s good enough to warrant such an increase. The relatively short range, and small missile count does not make it annoying or super dangerous to play against, even in uptiers.
1 Like
What happened to you claiming you played the Viggen btw? You’re kinda just saying PD and missiles?
I guess if the Po-2 somehow got them it would also be too strong for 11.3 by your definition
2 Likes
I do, and it’s the fact that they are piss easy to dodge with multipathing . And that’s your only damn reason for it going up. 2 missiles. Not its flight model or anything, just its 2 missiles.
It’s like talking o a broken record. I’d have more of a chance convincing a brick wall.
You really can’t argue with stupid.
Yo can you clear up this topic please? @Pheonix_RX01 has been cluttering it with random nonsense and attempts to start arguments.
Counterpoint JA37D which is a mediocre 12.0 is in some regards way more advanced than the C that a .3 difference in BR would make the C worthless
3 Likes
Nonsense? I didn’t spread false information like you, anybody with basic reading comprehension can literally see that.
You come into to these chats without any actual substance and think your opinion is the only one that’s right.
It could, yeah but it’s unwarranted. It’s fine at 11.3. It’s strong, yeah, but not stronger than a Mig-23. Not strong enough to be .3 below the Viggen D with no RB74’s (Aim-9L’s) and a crap ton more countermeasures.
1 Like
Then don’t fire at planes that are multipathing . . .