It does not carry PL-9 or 10, and it doesn’t mount any russian weaponry.
Then you should agree that it should get pl 11,10,9 and r77and r27. Br increased or not as I have provided the most genuine link .
Forget the pl 12 x 4 as i can’t find the link or doc.
Check yourself and happy reading ; )
Haha. That thing is gonna be better than F-22 XD
Some J-8s did carry PL-9s but those were probably for testing purpose.
These are not reliable source
Books are better than unreliable websites.
Reply when you find something thats actually credible and is not just a summary and misinformation of all J-8 models.
Irrc PL-9 probably wasn’t mounted on J-8F.
PL-9 is export focused if i recall correctly, J-8F is not marketed towards export at all.
It did and can
What do you want me to post classified info about military secret?
It’s a Chinese government website and it states what can be shared.
Yes but many chinese planes meant for domestic usage tested it.
Books are written by nato defence members with little Intel
They lost interest on the plane as it was obsolete before it reached production.
I have given you the authentic link possible which chinise military has shared.
You dont need to post classified info. You just need to cite reliable source such as books, Brochures, declassified manuals
Just accept the fact that J-8F didn’t have 4 PL-12. Instead you should ask for PL-8B.
Ah yes because a book written in Mandirin, by a PLAF officer, is Nato proporganda…
Nothing is indicating this on the website. Even more so, following Twitter link we see this:
Independent coverage on defence matters in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and East Asia
INDIPENDENT. Just someone very interested in Chinese military and writing their blog about it
Edit: Lmao, they even put their location as in London, UK
This is a blogging site. Do you think Chinese government can’t afford a proper website? Have you ever seen a government website?
Now see this
The guy who posted this clearly never seen a PL-11. Its clearly a training variant of PL-12.
1 Like