Wait a minute you’re telling me if i play it the most it should be above a 1.0? Why didn’t i hear that in the first place now i’ll do really well in that heaping pile of garbage. It’s literally a jack of like 2 trades master of none
“No , I do not care about your stats. You didn’t even bother to read what I said and just assume it to be something else. Yeah your stats is shit, who care ? The thing is , it is not about whether a SPAA can fight decently or not , what I said was what they can offer to a match beside being an Anti-…”
Also to quote LMFAO
I’m not defending the J-7D, i am asking you to please explain why it is good. I can go look at almost any other Mig and find better stuff about them so please explain instead of just saying i shoot down all arguments about it.
The J-7D’s advantages lie mainly in its airframe and missiles.
It has same airframe with MiG-21MF, but its engine is far better, and in terms of performance, it is almost better to the MiG-21SMT, which has a more powerful engine. In terms of acceleration up to just before VNE, there is little difference between the J-7D and the MiG-21SMT due to the former’s lighter airframe.
When it comes to missiles, the PL-5B is often used in most cases. Although the missile’s timeout period itself is not that long, it can reach its target faster than other “long-range” missiles such as the AIM-9G and R-13M1 within its lifetime. Also, since the PL-5B’s rocket motor has a relatively short burn time, the specs for the AAM’s diamond marker in the game mean that the target is almost always sent back to the hangar without noticing the missile.
Honestly, If the J-7D could only carry AAMs equivalent to the regular R-60s, it might have been justified to stay at 10.7BR, but the biggest problem is the missiles, so that is impossible.
It is ridiculous that the F-4F Early and F-104G(ROCAF) has the same BR as the J-7D.
