Moreover, the low altitude limit speed of J10A has nothing to do with the acceleration ability, even if the top speed can only reach Mach 1.25, it will not affect the acceleration performance. gaijin obviously increases the resistance of J10A under the condition that the thrust of J10A engine is unchanged. What is the reason for this modification and which literature is cited? I hope GAIJIN can give me a reply.
3 Likes
I think that’s a interview about testing the prototype of J10,which is not the same to J10A in the dev server. Gaijin made a factual mistake again.
I quote:J-10a这幽默阻力是怎么回事？ - #22 by SpitW
The max speed of j10 prototype is 1453km/h displayed by speed indicator in the cockpit, in other words, its IAS instead of true air speed.
1 Like
Yada yada yada and the F-15C is too heavy. It would be cool if gaijin would actually consider bug reports and not throw them into the trash
Gaijin just like copy-paste,we all know that…
They just accept those information what they thought it is true.It heppens when someone argue for challenger’s armor;VT4A’s armor;reload speed of T72 autoloader;traversing mechanism of AKD 9 missile carriers;F-16AJ from planning…dozens of examples can be listed.
2 Likes
Everything is too outrageous .Their method of limiting the low altitude flight speed of J10A is to add significant flight resistance to J10A .When J10A is flying at high altitude, this resistance still exists .This deliberate weakening of the supersonic acceleration performance of high-altitude aircraft is wrong.
3 Likes
It is incorrect to weaken J10 based on Li Zhonghua’s statement. In the original text, J10 is clearly stronger. At a speed of 1453 Mach, there was a tremor instead of the limit. In the same paragraph, it was mentioned that the top speed was 2.35 Mach. According to the unpacking documents, it is unreasonable to easily increase resistance to weaken the aircraft. The configuration of J10 determines that the acceleration of the aircraft itself will be quite excellent. Please fix the resistance problem
关于根据李中华的说法来削弱J10是错误的在在原话中J10明显要更强，原话在是1453马赫速度时出现了震颤而不是极限，同一段话里更是说了极速是2.35马赫，根据拆包文件，轻易的加高阻力来削弱飞机是不合理的，J10的飞机构型决定了这架飞机本身加速会相当优秀，请修复阻力问题
6 Likes
J10: A very interesting game increases the resistance of my body
2 Likes
No its the players who are getting “mobilized” since people thought the forum was blocked and proceeded to discuss on other existing platforms. We just told them the forum was accessible at all times and translators today arent that stupid.
According to the April 2007 issue《兵器知识》，the wing shape and adjustable intake duct of J-10 are more suitable for supersonic flight, so it can be determined that its supersonic acceleration is better than that of F16.
This can prove that J10 has excellent supersonic acceleration performance.
5 Likes
In this interview article, Li Zhonghua clearly stated that the low altitude high meter speed subject is testing the strength of the J-10A aircraft.
In an interview, Li Zhonghua said, "When accelerating to a surface speed of 1450km/h at low altitude (below 1000 meters), the plane began to vibrate, and then Li Zhonghua reported that the tower had stopped testing. This means that the J-10A in the game should only start at 1450km/h on the red chart.
In the game, the red watch speed is only the speed at which the wings begin to tremble, not the top flight speed. It is incorrect for you to mistake the low altitude red gauge speed of the J-10A for its low altitude top speed.
This is not an excuse to increase supersonic flight resistance for the J-10A.
In this interview article, Li Zhonghua clearly stated that the low altitude high meter speed subject is testing the strength of the J-10A aircraft.
In an interview, Li Zhonghua said, "When accelerating to a surface speed of 1450km/h at low altitude (below 1000 meters), the plane began to vibrate, and then Li Zhonghua reported that the tower had stopped testing. This means that the J-10A in the game should only start at 1450km/h on the red chart.
In the game, the red watch speed is only the speed at which the wings begin to tremble, not the top flight speed. It is incorrect for you to mistake the low altitude red gauge speed of the J-10A for its low altitude top speed.
This is not an excuse to increase supersonic flight resistance for the J-10A.
6 Likes
Please Gaijin carefully solve the unreasonable bug in J10A!
3 Likes
If you are interested in how we discuss this issue you may follow this link:J-10a这幽默阻力是怎么回事？ if you can understand Chinese☺.
3 Likes
Well, no, but at same time - kinda
Those who deal with issue said that this interview is “ appropriate source material for historical issues”(Community Bug Reporting System). On the contrary, they add a 1.21 Ma speed limit on it according to the same interview(J-10a这幽默阻力是怎么回事？ - #3). If that is not a double-standard behavior, then what is?
6 Likes
I don’t understand why it’s contradictory for an official to say “interviews can’t be used as evidence” when a player provides an issue, but now it’s contradictory to use an interview as evidence for nerfing J10A!
2 Likes
Unfortunately I can’t understand Chinese. I’m bad with languages and can barely manage the one.
Hi, everyone in this link is angry because gaijin used data from an interview to undermine the J-10A. but the admins themselves have stated that interviews cannot be used as evidence.
To take a step back, even if gaijin had to use data from an interview, that interviewee’s original statement was not that the J-10A would disintegrate at 1453 mph, but that it would vibrate at 1453 mph
5 Likes
Alas
1 Like