J-10A: The Firebird

no,it’s indicated airspeed not true airspeed.

Devs really should rethink about the slugish of this fighter by their double standard

1 Like

Incredible to see what comes out of the woodwork after this airframe gets a flight model correction. But yet they remained entirely silent during what was an obvious incomplete flight model that was clearly performing past what should be possible.
Most of us understand that what is in the dev server is often times not what ends up in game as things get tweaked constantly between dev server and release. I would encourage everyone to slow down on sensationalist over hype and over reactions and see how it ends up performing upon release before we knee jerk this airplane to one extreme or another.

1 Like

It turns out that ‘gaijin’ only believes in what they think, not in the facts

4 Likes

I don’t know if you played the VT4A1 vehicle during the time when it was first added to the game, with its unfinished front body armor, uneven fuel tanks (obviously unreasonable) on the left and right, and a very strange transmission system, we kept silent about because we felt that it was still in the test server development phase and not yet complete. As a result, they directly migrated the test server state into the live server, and within a month, the vehicle was basically unplayable.

In short, my point is, if we don’t express our dissatisfaction with the completion of a new vehicle since the dev server stage, GAJIN will think that everyone are very satisfied with their work.

4 Likes

Can you explain what " Top speed of Mach 2!" means? @Stona_WT

4 Likes

We need the correct air resistance and accelerate performance。its too slow 。we need
correct plane

1 Like

We need documents from CCP to state that FM is wrong。

Then where’s Gaijin’s document? Let me tell u. They get their data from an interview and rejected all the issues which is based on the interview they offered, as they think TV programs are unreliable information sources!

1 Like

Gaijin don’t have to prove anything)

Of course they don’t have to prove anything, just like they can keep their double standards and discrimination without any explanation.

1 Like

Which double standarts?)
Theres no discrimination, lol

Yeah. Maybe you’ve been too “Gaijin” so you won’t be able to realise them.

1 Like

Huh?
And which double standarts are in game?)

L2PSO without D armor. There was only one PSO in our world, which does use D armor. It’s pretty unfair to give Sweden 3 D-armor leopards and left Germany with L2A7 only.

2 Likes

Thats not double standart
Thats just a bug

Go check the issues. You will find everything “not a bug”. Gaijin says that, not me.

2 Likes

Then theres troubles in report, lol

This is very difficult. Like the French, we don’t like to expose information related to military equipment. If you open the warehouse, you will find that the name of the Cold War tank ammunition of World War II in France is still unknown. Gaijin can only call it AP and speculate on its performance laterally. LeClair’s new armour piercing ammunition is also far away because there is no data at all. China is also the same. We bought a large number of LH29TE from Russia, but even now there is only one picture of PLAJH7A using this ammunition. We like to keep it confidential too much

2 Likes

there are 360 ​​people still waiting for a mod to respond to us…

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/e9gTIpUADREo

1 Like