J10: A very interesting game increases the resistance of my body
2 Likes
No its the players who are getting “mobilized” since people thought the forum was blocked and proceeded to discuss on other existing platforms. We just told them the forum was accessible at all times and translators today arent that stupid.
According to the April 2007 issue《兵器知识》，the wing shape and adjustable intake duct of J-10 are more suitable for supersonic flight, so it can be determined that its supersonic acceleration is better than that of F16.
This can prove that J10 has excellent supersonic acceleration performance.
5 Likes
In this interview article, Li Zhonghua clearly stated that the low altitude high meter speed subject is testing the strength of the J-10A aircraft.
In an interview, Li Zhonghua said, "When accelerating to a surface speed of 1450km/h at low altitude (below 1000 meters), the plane began to vibrate, and then Li Zhonghua reported that the tower had stopped testing. This means that the J-10A in the game should only start at 1450km/h on the red chart.
In the game, the red watch speed is only the speed at which the wings begin to tremble, not the top flight speed. It is incorrect for you to mistake the low altitude red gauge speed of the J-10A for its low altitude top speed.
This is not an excuse to increase supersonic flight resistance for the J-10A.
In this interview article, Li Zhonghua clearly stated that the low altitude high meter speed subject is testing the strength of the J-10A aircraft.
In an interview, Li Zhonghua said, "When accelerating to a surface speed of 1450km/h at low altitude (below 1000 meters), the plane began to vibrate, and then Li Zhonghua reported that the tower had stopped testing. This means that the J-10A in the game should only start at 1450km/h on the red chart.
In the game, the red watch speed is only the speed at which the wings begin to tremble, not the top flight speed. It is incorrect for you to mistake the low altitude red gauge speed of the J-10A for its low altitude top speed.
This is not an excuse to increase supersonic flight resistance for the J-10A.
6 Likes
Please Gaijin carefully solve the unreasonable bug in J10A!
3 Likes
If you are interested in how we discuss this issue you may follow this link:J-10a这幽默阻力是怎么回事？ if you can understand Chinese☺.
3 Likes
Well, no, but at same time - kinda
Those who deal with issue said that this interview is “ appropriate source material for historical issues”(Community Bug Reporting System). On the contrary, they add a 1.21 Ma speed limit on it according to the same interview(J-10a这幽默阻力是怎么回事？ - #3). If that is not a double-standard behavior, then what is?
6 Likes
I don’t understand why it’s contradictory for an official to say “interviews can’t be used as evidence” when a player provides an issue, but now it’s contradictory to use an interview as evidence for nerfing J10A!
2 Likes
Unfortunately I can’t understand Chinese. I’m bad with languages and can barely manage the one.
Hi, everyone in this link is angry because gaijin used data from an interview to undermine the J-10A. but the admins themselves have stated that interviews cannot be used as evidence.
To take a step back, even if gaijin had to use data from an interview, that interviewee’s original statement was not that the J-10A would disintegrate at 1453 mph, but that it would vibrate at 1453 mph
5 Likes
Alas
1 Like
no,it’s indicated airspeed not true airspeed.
Devs really should rethink about the slugish of this fighter by their double standard
1 Like
Incredible to see what comes out of the woodwork after this airframe gets a flight model correction. But yet they remained entirely silent during what was an obvious incomplete flight model that was clearly performing past what should be possible.
Most of us understand that what is in the dev server is often times not what ends up in game as things get tweaked constantly between dev server and release. I would encourage everyone to slow down on sensationalist over hype and over reactions and see how it ends up performing upon release before we knee jerk this airplane to one extreme or another.
1 Like
It turns out that ‘gaijin’ only believes in what they think, not in the facts
4 Likes
I don’t know if you played the VT4A1 vehicle during the time when it was first added to the game, with its unfinished front body armor, uneven fuel tanks (obviously unreasonable) on the left and right, and a very strange transmission system, we kept silent about because we felt that it was still in the test server development phase and not yet complete. As a result, they directly migrated the test server state into the live server, and within a month, the vehicle was basically unplayable.
In short, my point is, if we don’t express our dissatisfaction with the completion of a new vehicle since the dev server stage, GAJIN will think that everyone are very satisfied with their work.
4 Likes
We need the correct air resistance and accelerate performance。its too slow 。we need
correct plane
1 Like
We need documents from CCP to state that FM is wrong。