Are you one of those people who comment trying to guess what the other person is saying without having read their previous comments?
These vehicles are themselves undertiered. Plus, the T-72 is currently only .3 above vehicles such as the M60A3, Dalets, A1A1. It’s the same BR as the Strv 105, Olifant, AMX-32, even Leopards and OF-40s. It undoubtedly needs to go up.
What makes you say that? The vehicle with less than 300mm penetration at point blank and 2/3 crew behind a 205mm effective plate is the one that is op?
obviously you aren’t comparing the Kpz to 8.3s as you should.
1 Like
I can’t see how T-72A is 0.3 better than AMX-32, Leos and OF-40.
It should go up first, yes.
T-72A beats it in terms of armor and shell, while KPz-70 has better mobility, reload speed, gun handling, gun depression, optics and comes with adaptive suspension. It also has a 20mm autocannon for helicopters or light vehicles.
1 Like
His kpz 70 has 0.5 kd, obviously doesn’t know how to play it and totally disregarded the vehicle strong point. Also it can lob HEAT while completely hidden behind a cover in long range maps if they know how to use the binocular to align their gunner sight, after playing other 9.3s I felt sorry for the T-72A, sometimes feels like a dinosaur
Don’t get me wrong, T-72A is a decent 9.3 but it’s far from being OP. Most people thinking it is just had shot it’s UFP too many times.
1 Like