Are you one of those people who comment trying to guess what the other person is saying without having read their previous comments?
These vehicles are themselves undertiered. Plus, the T-72 is currently only .3 above vehicles such as the M60A3, Dalets, A1A1. It’s the same BR as the Strv 105, Olifant, AMX-32, even Leopards and OF-40s. It undoubtedly needs to go up.
What makes you say that? The vehicle with less than 300mm penetration at point blank and 2/3 crew behind a 205mm effective plate is the one that is op?
obviously you aren’t comparing the Kpz to 8.3s as you should.
I can’t see how T-72A is 0.3 better than AMX-32, Leos and OF-40.
It should go up first, yes.
T-72A beats it in terms of armor and shell, while KPz-70 has better mobility, reload speed, gun handling, gun depression, optics and comes with adaptive suspension. It also has a 20mm autocannon for helicopters or light vehicles.
His kpz 70 has 0.5 kd, obviously doesn’t know how to play it and totally disregarded the vehicle strong point. Also it can lob HEAT while completely hidden behind a cover in long range maps if they know how to use the binocular to align their gunner sight, after playing other 9.3s I felt sorry for the T-72A, sometimes feels like a dinosaur
Don’t get me wrong, T-72A is a decent 9.3 but it’s far from being OP. Most people thinking it is just had shot it’s UFP too many times.