Isn't T-72A/M too op at 9.3 now?

Machinery of War Discussion
,
61

Yeah, yeah, they use their internal statistics for balance.
Seeing how T-72A is sitting in the same place for years with minimal changes makes me believe it isn’t overperforming.

They might have different pros/cons, but overall they should be on par.

We’re talking about current state of the game, not some theoretical world after decompression.

No reason for T-72A to be at the same BR as T-64B/Sabra and be just 0.3 below Leopard 2AV.

1 Like
62

Ok

63

Also, all 9.3 MBTs should be firmly locked in place while German bias wagon KPz-70 remains at 9.3.

64

Ok

65

No need to reply if you can’t form a coherent sentence.

1 Like
66

I just don’t respect your opinion

67

No need to respect anything to know KPz-70 is the vehicle that has to go up first until anything else can move.

68

In your opinion

69

By saying T-72A needs to go to 9.7, you’re literally saying it’s better than KPz-70. Can you elaborate how/why ?

2 Likes
70

Both can got to 9.7 and work perfectly fine once the game has been more decompressed

71

Keywordonce.
T-72 against 10.7 would be nothing more than a slow “heavy” tank whose armor won’t work against plenty of threats.

72

(once the game has been more decompressed)

73

No point of this thread as it’s obvious decompression is needed, and moving single vehicles around would do nothing but move the problem elsewhere.

74
  • I’d much rather the TURM III moved up before T-72
  • In an M48A2GA2 just about every 8.7+ vehicle is horrible to face, in fact T-72 is far from the worst things to face. Same if you use the T-55A vs XM-1 which it’s completely outclassed in mobility, gun handling and firepower, and it struggles to anything to the XM if it’s hull down.
  • Why not do the same for the T-72A at 9.7? It would get absolutely dumpstered by 10.7s like Vickers Mk.7/M1/Leo2A4 and all of the race cars like the Stryker and Type 16 which aren’t even 10.7. It would be flat out worse than the T-64BV and it can’t get 3BM42 since the gun can’t fire it.
  • Comparing tanks to a full BR below them to determine if it’s OP or not as a baseline is extremely stupid, you’d have to uptier the T32s because they destroy Tigers IIs and the T-54s stand no chance against Chieftains.

As if anyone respects yours

have you even played T-72A?

2 Likes
75

Ok, you’ve clearly not anything I’ve said, I’ve never claimed to have played the T72A I’ve simply said… Can we make a fair comparison of everything it faces… Fkin simple.

76

We are.
Because we’re including other 9.3s.

Simple.

1 Like
77

But no 8.3 or 10.3…

78

?
If were saying vehicles shouldn’t be balanced based of +1.0 why would we then compare the T-72A to 10.3s which is the same thing we’re disagreeing with you on? You aren’t as smart as you think you are.

Besides, the ZTZ96A and Challenger Mk.2 destroy the T-72A so bad it’s not even funny.

1 Like
79

Read

80

are you one of those that has nothing to say but has to have the final word?

1 Like