Isn't F-111A/C should be equivalent to Su-24M in Nuclear Thunder?

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
1

got curious about aircraft choices in this event,

while both team got a sub-sonic attacker with air-to-ground armaments (Su-25T | A-10A, A-7E) and a supersonic fighter with air-to-air/small nuclear armaments (F-4E | MiG-23MLD)
but why USSR is the only one who got a supersonic attacker-bomber with big nuclear armament?
why F-4E got the both small/big nuclear to do the role instead of giving the big nuclear to F-111?

8 Likes
2

Supersonic is doing a lot of heavy lifting here

The su24 is more a f111a with a better placed airbrake

And way worse top speed

4 Likes
3

Yeah, there’s no point in the A-6E since it’s rubbish

4

The F-111A isn’t even comparable, and the F-111F which is the model that might be worth discussing is better than the Su-24

5

Implement the F-111F, as the US team has an inferior fighter aircraft by default.

2 Likes
6

(f111a)just plane wise i find them very comparable both supersonic which are transonic most of the time
at altitude the f111a can actually reach significant speeds unlike the su24

7

F-4J

8

I believe they mean the free places you receive. Let’s be honest with ourselves the Russian free ones are absolutely better than the American ones, at least in my time playing the event.

2 Likes
9

Yeah