Isn't F-111A/C should be equivalent to Su-24M in Nuclear Thunder?

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
1

got curious about aircraft choices in this event,

while both team got a sub-sonic attacker with air-to-ground armaments (Su-25T | A-10A, A-7E) and a supersonic fighter with air-to-air/small nuclear armaments (F-4E | MiG-23MLD)
but why USSR is the only one who got a supersonic attacker-bomber with big nuclear armament?
why F-4E got the both small/big nuclear to do the role instead of giving the big nuclear to F-111?

1 Like
2

Supersonic is doing a lot of heavy lifting here

The su24 is more a f111a with a better placed airbrake

And way worse top speed

2 Likes
3

Yeah, there’s no point in the A-6E since it’s rubbish

4

The F-111A isn’t even comparable, and the F-111F which is the model that might be worth discussing is better than the Su-24

5

Implement the F-111F, as the US team has an inferior fighter aircraft by default.

6

(f111a)just plane wise i find them very comparable both supersonic which are transonic most of the time
at altitude the f111a can actually reach significant speeds unlike the su24