Fixed that for you. All of those have their pros and cons and are within ear shot of each other for different reasons. With space between them and those below/above them. Although the leclerc could go below, the speed and rear aiming do a lot, same with autoloader. I think these are all quite reasonably placed.
Im grinding Isreal at the moment.
Can we have a petition to stop matching them with USA ? I fear my last braincell is getting rotten by it.
This doesn’t explain the 30% win rate at all. The US is above average and yet they have 30% win rate, the problem lies within its players. There are too many premium players exaggerated by the Clickbait sale.
that is true on average in top tier I would see like 5-6 click baits on my team
click-bait jumpscare:
Spoiler
btw, i just camped hull down near respaw. Tank is good, but map need to help too
lol, its nice when its experienced click baits though
Even without US teammates I fear there is nothing good waiting for you at the end of the Israeli tree, coming from someone who finished the entire ground tree.
Merkava Mk.4s are trash and some of the worst 11.3+ MBTs, you have at best a 10.3 AA that is already shit at it’s own BR and you have a single support vehicle.
Yes i am aware of that, didn’t stop me with the UK either lol.
i just camped hull down near respaw
You may be the first ever abrams player to play it how it is mean to be played lmao
I think Russia is about even with the U.S. just different use cases for their advantages.
What advantages does US top tier have right now, though? A higher reverse gear?
Why do you keep shilling here when you are nowhere near top tier
Want to attempt to even address the argument at hand?
Gun depression, reverse gear, firepower, overall mobility for half the tanks…
You don’t have an argument, whatever you are trying to argue about is defacto invalid by the simple fact that you have no idea what you’re talking about
what’s his level?
He has a total of 2061 battles, you can see by clicking on the names here. Level isnt a good judging factor anymore
Gun depression, reverse gear, firepower, overall mobility for half the tanks…
- On mostly flat and/or urban maps?
- Already mentioned that
- 50mm of pen is barely a difference
- The difference in mobility is not that great, actually the T-80BVM’s mobility (in hp/ton terms) compared to the 11.7 Abrams is a larger gap than the 11.7 Abrams to the T-90M
whatever you are trying to argue about is defacto invalid by the simple fact that you have no idea what you’re talking about
Looking at a vehicle’s performance is impossible without being in a match with it? Did protection analysis, datamines, or other players posting their gameplay just poof out of existence all of a sudden?
Looking at a vehicle’s performance is impossible without being in a match with it? Did protection analysis, datamines, or other players posting their gameplay just poof out of existence all of a sudden?
No, but with 0 experience it gives you only 10% of the picture, and an error margin of 90%. Which means you can even be completely wrong about it
I’d say it’s the other way around, because without some sort of very niche strategy (i.e. playing matters <10%) the downsides of the Abrams cannot be overcome.
Looking at a vehicle’s performance is impossible without being in a match with it? Did protection analysis, datamines, or other players posting their gameplay just poof out of existence all of a sudden?
Yet your understanding of top tier is just not there and it shows in what you are posting here.
You really want to die on that hill dont you, well I can stop you either way