I have no idea what you’re meaning to say here.
In response to the post prior to the one you’re responding to about being shot in the turret ring.
I’d hardly call Renzo a ‘‘M1 Elitist’’.
If his experience has been trouble free when it comes to turret ring pens, that’s fine, right?
It’s a play on words, not meant to be taken seriously.
and now show where i am a soviet main.
I don’t think you’re a soviet main but I fundamentally disagree that soviet vehicles are the worst available.
1 Like
The only people saying such silly things are soviet mains.
3 Likes
While it is consistent that most players complaining about tanks often main that nation, he’s mainly a USA/GER player.
He just doesn’t know he’s a soviet main yet
5 Likes
attend reeducation camp tomorrow morning comrade )))
No, I’m just speaking facts.
And i still got no evidence why I’m soviet main.
Are you a trololo or something?
You seriously think Ariete is better than T-90M and T-80BVM?
2 Likes
T-80 bvm is better than challenger, ariete and merkava, but worse than all other mbts. T-90M is even worser.
I came across someone who seriously thought that. According to them the T-80BVM was among the worst top tier MBTs and Russia was the worst top tier nation.
Meanwhile the Ariete was not as bad everyone was saying and it had everything it needed to be a decent/good top tier MBT (not my words).
Anyway, the 2A7s and Strv 122s are the balance problem at top tier, I don’t know why a lot of people are still stuck in the past thinking that the BVM is still a major problem. Post buff M1A2s are pretty much asymmetrically equal to the BVM, hell I personally would pick my M1A2s over the BVM.
5 Likes
Naah i always look at people who say " skill issue " to be trolls or dumb.
OUR?
i dont even have that F-16 :D never bothered to buy it.
if you get enough points to even get to it…
What do you mean, every nation at top tier has access to American GBUs. or AGMs.
1 Like
I don’t see that as true.
Observe, my highly scientific, serious and well-informed ranking:
2 Likes
I cry inside seeing so many Challengers on “Ew Brother” tier. Especially a 2A4 being ranked higher then the 3TD.
Side note: Where Merkavas at?
None of what you said here matters.
It’s a correction. It’s historically accurate. It doesn’t need to make sense to you because we don’t want the overpowered “2000mmKEprotectionNEOW” y’all make us out to want in these debates.
The Abrams is a fantastic machine, but deserves corrections to the areas we have defined.
Would additional KE protection to the lower front plate be possible? It’s known that it is. But that’s not something we can bring to the table to Gaijin, for obvious reasons.
So we start with the corrections that are most obvious and jarring. The turret ring being a huge one.
3 Likes
Win rate is a metric of team skill, thus citing win rate is claiming vehicles are balanced.
KDR compared to like-vehicles the player also plays is a metric used to indicate how powerful a vehicle is over another.
You have to REMOVE the skill portion of statistics or you’re arguing that people have a skill issue, whether you intend to argue that or not.
It’s why Thunderskill explicitly states that its stats are not evidence of how powerful vehicles are and cannot be used as such:
Kept original resolution for sharing.
It’s 100% irrelevant if a player is a passive player or not.
All that’s relevant if they’re consistent in their tactics so their KDRs are usable data.
1 Like