Never understood why folks gotta ask that question
American air has the most amount of under-BR’d aircraft in the game.
American ground has a number of under-BR’d tanks such as M1A1.
They are not “nerfed”.
HSTVL has a correct reload speed and it doesn’t need to change.
Bushmaster damage is there. Claiming it’s not is also claiming BMP’s autocannons are weaker than they should be as well.
Abrams protection is conservatively estimated like with all classified armor. I think it should be liberally estimated, but it’s not. Whining about it won’t change it, only finding documentation or someone making a suggestion on the forums to change the armor estimation scheme for all classified armor in War Thunder would change it.
F-15C’s engines are not missing thrust, I cannot post the thrust curves as I haven’t confirmed their distribution status, but they are identical to the F-15A and C’s engines.
USA is a top 3 top tier ground lineup in War Thunder. USSR isn’t even top 5.
USA fires the best round in the game.
USA has the 2nd best reload rate of all tanks.
USA has average armor.
USA has above average mobility.
USA has the most amount of tanks for a top BR lineup.
USA has an OP helicopter.
USA has the 2nd best light tank in the game.
USA gets TOW missiles at 8.3, and more of them. Superior missiles to Falanga.
@An_Pigeon
J-11’s flight model was obviously fixed because all Sukhois were fixed.
J-11B has the best placeholder radar of any aircraft Gaijin has added, which is props to them.
China tanks are more mobile, and fire the “same” rounds as the Soviets.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Just look at how many people complain about it bruv,theres a reason no?
I can play it and get nukes with it if so idc tbh
Just to be on the same page,are we talking about the same Jumbo here?
I mean both the 75 Jumbo and 76 Jumbo are incredibly easy to play.
People complain about every vehicle in game, a lot of the time it’s because they fail in it.
I mean that is good, although getting nukes isn’t super hard in general, let alone in a Jumbo.
The opinion is proven to be wrong that is why.
That the one, I couldn’t remember if it got grouped in with the FM fixes or left out.
I knew there was something wrong with it just couldn’t remember what and made an incorrect assumption, cheers for correcting me mate.
eh the “same” round but slightly worse, as well as losing out on some protection, the VT4A1 having the issue with it’s armour having a void or something in it is still there.
alegedly they have spall liners etc too. TBH I find them extremely fun tanks as they are, though the reload is a bit of a back breaker at the higher BRs esecially seeing as most top tiers got a damn 5 second reload ( well there abouts 5.3 in most cases)
People complain about the best vehicles in game, that doesn’t make them bad it makes the people that are using htem bad.
the huey has fixed 6x optics while the russian helis with falangas have either fixed 8x or 10x
damn thats a bit problematic then. anyhow it is hard enough to hit falangas especially at moving targets from further than 3 km out. but also you basically need to be that far cause all the low tier russian helis are boats. And most of them inevitably move forward so if youre not very careful you end up too close to the ao before you realize youve been moving all the time…the alouette not so much. its hard enough hitting these from 1.5 km out, even with radar lead if they are dodging.
It depends on the argument and as i stated i didn’t really know what the argument was about until renzo said what it was about.