wanna try later tonight in game? dodging radar aa is easy af in the alouette while guiding the missile in as long as you got an eye on them and are aware they might or are shooting. its close to impossible hitting a alouette sitting at long range while hes actively dodging. But trying the same in any russian heli (especially the mi4av) is close to impossible.
bonus points for you in the spaa if you sit close to hard cover, so even if you might not hit the alouette, you make it harder for him hitting targets but you can also go in cover if you realize hes trying to take you out. Most people just sit still out in the open spraying at the radar lead marker wondering why they arent hitting while the funny missile is flying right towards them
There are good chunks of the tech tree that are unusable if you dont know how to play
M6?Heavy tank with no armor
Jumbo?Lacks ordinance to retailate but trollish armor if used correctly which most player dont
M41 and M19 both AA that are one of the worse ive played on other nations,at least sometimes if you somehow managed to get behind someone you can kill tanks with them
The rest of the M4s have ok ordinances but lack proper protection
The only time the tanks are “forgiving” for a simple mistake its when you reach 6.7 with the T26Es and T32s and T34
But then its start to fade once again making only 2 tanks in a whole br bracket usable,being the Xm803 and MBT70 but thats fairly it
Cause you know how to use them?I could say the same i rather play the Jumbo rather other tanks at that Br bracket but its only cause i know how to play it
How does it? the armour makes up for it, the players being idiots with it doesn’t change how good or bad the tank is.
They’re decent SPAA in my experience for thier BR’s as well, ancedotal evidence doesn’t make the vehicle good or bad it makes you good or bad with the vehicle.
I’m sorry you’ve got the sherman jumbo with an M26 turret and gun at 6.0
You’ve got the M24, chaffees, M5A1 stuart etc all at a low BR. even the M22 is great for its BR.
what ??
The M60A3 TTS is a solid 9.0 tank, the entire 8.3 and 8.0 lineup are unbelievable.
7.7 has the likes of M103, M48A1, the T54E2, F80 for cas etc
7.0 has the T29 whihc should be 7.3 ´
that is completely irrelevant to how a vehicle is a player not know how to use a tank is a negative in every single vehicle in game.
THEY GET I TOW AT 8.7 xD
What even, so you can’t just roll around one tapping folks that makes the tank terrible?
What kinda META chasing mentality is that
Did i ever stated i struggle with the Jumbo?No…i said its a good vehicle only when you know how to play
The Jumbo will get obliterated frontally from a Tiger 1 and expecially the 88
Not struggle, but your stats pretty adorable for a vehicle as easy to play as the Jumbos.
And that is supposed to be impressive? Or an indicator of skill? (not a mock, I have just never really understood what the intention is when people say this)
So sorry to disrupt this argument (haven’t read anything)
But why do people always resort to looking up how many games a player has in a specific vehicle? Or look up how many hours the person has ingame?
Are we really tryna win an argument by resorting to how “ “skilled” a player is?
(As i haven’t read more than 4 replies i don’t know what the argument was about so sorry for that)
Noyl’s argument was that the Jumbo was a difficult tank to play, my argument (and Pigeon’s) was that it’s a very and easy to play tank.
It was stated why it’s a forgiving tank (good armor and stabilizer), but Noyl disagreed and posted what I perceived as a confident/overconfident remark. So if I see those of course I’ll check out if it’s warranted confidence or just overconfidence.
