Yeah cause that like , all they can do. Darter/Derbie/R-77/AAM-4 are mostly mid to close range (even then it can magically lose track under 10km. It is not in the same league, if anything MICA should have been the bar (lol) for those thing.
AMRAAM are still good for BVR. Using them for mid range is still good but close range is like lol lmao even.
I have also used both and for close range I would always choose Derbies over amraam.
AAM4 is is almost as good as AIM120 out to about as far as you can reasonably launch
Well im aware of that, as I stated: Morvran said the only meaningful advantage the Aim120 has is range, which isn’t true, the derbies and R darters in closer ranges are better but middle to long range amraam will do better than them.
I genuinely BTW am really like teh 15C
That’s not what I said. I said it’s one of the worse missiles, as in it doesn’t compare very well to most other top tier fox 3 missiles with a couple exceptions
It doesn’t meaningfully go fast enough compared other jets to get away with it, also your radar is far from the best so aircraft can slip by pretty easily
I’m talking about ARB
They have higher G-Overloads, making them more effective at closer ranges.
Last time I flew the SAAF Gripen C, the R-Darters were terrible if the target was far away, but if it was in the LSZ, seemed to be very hard to defend against, far harder than AMRAAM are
they dont though, they just dont have stupidly gimped fin AOA, so they can actually hit their G-Overload limit
Tomato Tomato, but fair enough
the difference is that its an artificial nerf to AMRAAMs that gaijin made without any sources, despite sources that state they have a higher G-overload than some other top tier ARH missiles
It should be pretty good, especially if you have good matchmaking.
Yeah, but what I mean is right here right now. In shorter ranged battles, AMRAAM is currently at a disadvantage. Its almost certainly worng, Flame’s reports from 18 months ago have been sat ignored
it really benefitted from the BR decompression
Yes but F16AM doesn’t have radar HMD, and to equip the MAW you have to give up at least 1 missile
This Is a erroneous, and will be fixed eventually.
This restriction is entirely a fabrication on Gaijin’s part, as shown above the entire PIDS familiy is rated for a STD-1760 compatibility, nothing should stop them from being loaded.
The US both Air Tech Tree and Ground Tech Tree are nerfed or heavly nerfed for “balancing” reasons that are unknown,even to Gaijin
Like a 5 second reload from the blow out panel racks while tanks with basically the same way of reloading (leo 2s) have 6 seconds for example?
Stop using basics excuses not gonna lie
Where my protection at…ah right…theres none on the Abrams
Where my Bushmaster dmg?Ah right once again,theres none…
Where the proper reload speed of the HSTVL?No one to be found once again
Do i have to show you how insanely trash are the Bradleys bushmaster or what
The only Bushmaster who works fairly well its the one the EFV has,the other ones in the bradleys blows so hard that they struggle sometimes or should i say,most of the times to kill even light vehicles
Nope, you don’t. i know the bushmaster isnt the best autocannon in game. and like with basically every tech tree in game theres stuff that needs fixing. My point was just one of the examples where a important us tank wasnt exactly nerfed in comparison to similar tanks is it?
but to claim theres no protection on the abrams, well…you’re free to try plaing the leclerc, the challys or the type ten to get a real feeling of “0” protection. If you want to go the proper reload speed route, youre in for a surprise facing the type ten and tkx i gotta tell you…Reload speed on any tank is a soft nerf stat. even on some autoloaded ones (even russian autoloader speed is currently on the verge of being changed and at the very least discussed as to what its actual reload speed should be to the next main round)
The abrams is fine and a very strong tank for top tier, tho it can and should get fixes to stuff that can be proven wrong by people that know more about the vehicle than the average player. If youre here to discuss why the snail takes ages to do so or somehow doesnt want to, this forum cant help you much.
Man that’s got to be one of the most well worded and polite messages talking about Abrams I’ve seen, I believe @_Renzo may know more about what Abrams have incorrect on them.
There are things which need rectified on it, same as you stated as most other tanks too!
Gaijin doesnt want the US to properly modeled stuff in the tech tree
Like ong,the bradleys are so trash i had to use the EFV who btw not only its biggers but somehow hits 100 times harder using the same APDS belt