U mean on the move? Yes, CR2 would be better due to it’s more expensive and complex suspension, that cannot even be adjusted like others of its kind, and it’s overall slower speed making it easier to stabilize.
Abrams is from 70’s your point is kind of irrelevant
I mean overall not the one specific tank kill at 5km which btw was a cr1
They were made with the coldwar in mind still as design began before the berlin wall came down then was put on hold by the british government during the gulf war, so vickers carried on their own researching and developing the tank.
It was designed to go up against T series tanks.
Its designed for all of it, lence so ieds and insurgency.
I suggest watching the rank museums tank chat on it
However the rifled barrel isnt the issue now its the 3 part ammo which they use for hesh, which is why they have the rifled barrel.
If they used a smooth bore or one piece ammo for the dart it would be gine for tank on tank
(it is now in 2024 falling short in damage compared to contemporary darts hence the upgrade to cr3)
I was more talking about stuff like gun depression or reverse speed that won’t even let you play from certain positions and will lock you in a certain playstyle.
They both have pros and cons
Its what he means by asymmetrical, which is actually makes things interesting
I’m talking from a skill floor perspective.
Yeah, it was but unlike Leopard they don’t upgrade for that role anymore instead heading toward war on terror no surprise on it really because Leopard is supposed to be main force defending European ground against case of Russian invasion Challenger 2 already fighting in middle east plus Brits happen to have large stockpile of HESH so they keep rifled and been using it in middle east since then.
Well average WT high tier maps already lock all of the tanks playstyle except go fight in the CQC anyways the playstyle that only Uparmored Leopard and T-tanks are the only two that capable fighting each other so i guess you can throw all gun depression and reverse stuff since the game embraces who have better armor wins.
I mean as of last year the cr3 has been signed.off even now the prototypes are there.
Im.blissfully aware that the cr2s purposed changed. Britain was in Afghanistan for over a decade naturally the upgrades would go that direction.
The armour protection has been praised by the Ukrainians using it in the war its.armour has never been in question.
Source for that? As when the cr2 was initially ordered it was over 1000 tanks ordered, as is mentioned per the tank chat from the tank museum, when the berlin wall came down ans the soviet union fell they dialed it back, as did germany.
Germanies leopard 2s were an export success, nothing to do with going to war with the soviet union as a main defender of europe. More as a defender for each nation.
That doesnt change the fact the cr2 is now especially ammo wise long in the tooth im.not debating that.
And never will.
But the cr2 in game under performs massively for comparison ti irl
Not true , the ztz99s and mbt2000 arent as armoured as either tbe leopard 2s or t seried and i beat both.
Positioning, attention and patience win games.
Not just armour
On most maps you’ll still have terrain that you need to have gun depression for and even relatively small bumps will make your gun face the sun, which is highly annoying and can get you killed.
Reverse speed is also useful in all playstyles.
ZTZ99 also gets broken literally every major patch somehow, the armor still isn’t what its supposed to be.
MBT-2000 has underperforming armor but its really mobile so that makes up for it at 11.0, otherwise itd be 11.3 or potentially even 11.7
So… hull ammo is a thing. In the Leo’s but Russia figured out removing the extra ammo outside of the auto loader caused tanks to eat far far more rounds.
I do better in tbe 99 II and III i genuinely believe all 3 should be 11.3 , mbt2000 too.
Side note genuinely loving tbe ztz 99s.right now
Can’t Abrams do more than 60mph without governor which has happened before. Apparently during 80’s Abram crews took them up to or past 70mph
Yeah until your patience reward you by getting bomb out of that position after you killed one or two tanks i used to have more patience and positioning like you before until it doesn’t work like it supposed to be anymore and turn out going CQC is less prone to get bomb than having patience i really don’t enjoy such garbage CQC gameplay but i had to survive.
Nah im creeping on 3k hours now, the patience with the awareness now saves me more than not.
Its genuinely how im doing better in the ztz99s than i do in tbe mbt 2000.
Tanks like the cr2 it just doesnt work, or i cant make it work.
The abrams is mobile enough to position.
Also do not camp the one spot always move.
Mph? Sounds quite high for the tank.
The m1 in game goes 72kmph which sounds more realistic for it.
The m1a1s were up.armoured and heavier with newer electronics etc and if i remember right sit at 68/70kmph range irl.
Checked there the top speed recorded by the marines is 67.89.kmph of the a1.series about 42mph
Crazy how fast they can be huh
As for later Abrams, they are all equipped with governors, which possibly could be removed or disabled and probably have been at some point which is why it’s only 68-70kph
They did hit at least 70mph on the autobahn during the cold war, considering how good Abrams acceleration is and was irl, especially with lighter M1 , it should be attainable on roads in-game
They have governor because of reliability issues with going that fast, and because it might mess up the crew getting all shaken up, but neither matter in game
The m1 can go 45mph maxed as well over 70kmph
If youve for a source for the 70mph id love to read that cause thats f’ing insane speed and genuinely want to read that. Not for fact checking btw dont worry
The governer is also to maintain the tank itself btw cause the parts would wear out incredibly fast at sustainijg a speed like that.
Genuinely on cross country not on mud the cr2 actually maintains a fair old speed as well think its about 43kmph which for a monster that size is insanely quick.
The chieftain funnily enough cross country was quite fast as well due to the suspension
Theres no hard GDLS stuff saying it can afaik, but this guy works/worked for GDLS and drove them
It is important to note that when he says stripped of armor this is most likely referring to early Abrams being lighter than later ones as they had less armor
Multiple other crew accounts of going over 60 or 70 mph you can find by googling