the guy deliberately says things to aggrevate dude, dont rise to it
1 Like
No ,he is not [irrational]
Sufficiently skilled M22s going up against BVMs can flank it. There is a line along the upper part of the BVMs track easily penetrated by the M51B1 Shot.
P-26s using terrain cover can sneak up on Su-34s, the P-26 will easily defeat the Su-34 in a dogfight.
The absolute state of bias apologists. No wonder you can’t play fair.
1 Like
If you cannot counter an argument just either don’t respond or tell us. No need to call people names because you can’t back up what you say.
I haven’t called you names but when you post increasingly stupid takes because of the backfire effect then eventually reasonable folks will ignore or laugh at you. At least that’s how it works outside of echo chambers.
1 Like
Me when I lie:
It’s entirely clear to me you do not want a constructive discussion. Have a good day and maybe go think a little.
these are just facts. if i called you a spineless inept midwit who plays on easy mode at the expense of other people and then lies about it in his little orwellian safe space, that’d be calling you names
1 Like
It’s almost as if simple facts would be easy to prove right? Maybe you should do that.
Can’t wait until you figure out you’re so blinded by thoughtless raging at “bias” that you failed to notice I don’t even play Russia.
What’s the point though? I’m a “bias apologist”. Happy holidays pal.
1 Like
That’s a lie, as it’s obvious all “bias apologists” are doing that to keep their bully machines as is so they can enjoy free kills and whatnot.
3 Likes
Funny how his USSR are the one of the least performing vehicle he played, while his Ariete and Leclerc are doing much better in terms of KDR and winning rate, even his Abrams are better than his T-80 lol maybe his stepsister who was a non-gamer also play it but he asks her to play the T-80 only lol
3 Likes
There was a version with Sidewinders. Beyond that the Brims shouldn’t have been nerfed. Russia has fire and forget A2G missiles that are absurd with a really long range. GB got shat on and got their missiles nerfed to the point they are pretty much worse hellfires. It’s ridiculous.
2 Likes
that’s the beauty of focusing on the argument, i don’t feel the need to check stats especially when i know i’m better than 99% of you even though i play much worse vehicles.
but in your case, you’ve got got a measly 2k battles and just 52 minutes of tank play time… so either you’re full of it and don’t know what you’re talking about, or you got banned. either way, most trustworthy bias apologist.
Backpedaling on a statement you determined your whole argument on because you overstepped. Nice.
Also do you know the definition of apologist?
Since that’s what you believe I am, why don’t you prove it to me. Prove to me that saying “Russian bias isn’t real” is an unpopular take that I only have to be controversial.
To save you time and effort I looked into it: it’s not at controversial take. One could even go so far to say you’re an apologist.
1 Like
i’m not going to argue further let alone play semantics with some liar at best and cheater at worst. thanks for making your side of this topic look like trash though
Is everyone who disagrees with you a “bias apologist”?
I firmly believe that Russian bias is a meme, and myth made up to excuse poor players poor performance.
I have not seen any evidence of it existing, mostly because any evidence applies to non-Russian stuff as well.
4 Likes
Oh no? Can’t argue your own point. So sad.
1 Like
on this topic yeah
the evidence is the winrate and the way the average US vs RU game goes. an absolute stompfest where half your team is gone in 5 minutes and what’s left gets hit with six kh38 per minute.
if i were to say that russia air performs worse at top tier just because of their players, it’d be equally as dishonest as blaming US ground players.
again the US premium line up being awful and russian AA being overpowered are the main reasons for this situation. giving the US better SAM, the Apache its Longbows (even a gaijin gimped version), and the Abrams a better round are very easy way to bring the winrate back to ~50% which is where it should be
The thing with that, is that top tier Russia actually has some of the worst top tier planes, unlike top tier USA in GRB where they have middle of the pack tanks.
The mediocre tanks combined with the abysmal players and the premium spam lead to a low winrate.
It already has the best firepower at top tier. (when combining reload+round quality)
Good. AA should be very good, and all nations need something equivalent to, or better than the pantsir. Plus, you can still dodge it based on what I’ve heard.
3 Likes
There isnt a reliable source of data for win/loss rates. In my personal experience, the question isnt which team has soviets and which team has US, the question is usually which team has Germany/Sweden.
This is extremely annoying ,though now Rafales are doing much the same with the AASM and I had an F-16C do it in a match not that long ago. KH-38s and other IOG equipped AGMs shouldnt have been added with the current top tier CAS balance. But thats an issue that affects everyone.
Given only the US and USSR have premium line-ups I think speaks volumes. Have tried tanks like the Challenger 2 OES?
Its probably entering the under-powered realm but the main issue its the only 11.0+ SPAA worthy of being at 11.0+. The other 9 nations should have gotten new SPAA 2 years ago and the fact we are still waiting really really sucks.
It’s all nations.
This I do agree with though, the hellfire is not a good AGM at top tier and a gimped (IR placeholder) AGM-114L would be nice, for Britain too.
Fairly certain it already has the best shell in game, with one of the best fire rates in game. What is needed is soem bug reports related to the turret ring fixed. Thats it. Abrams is a fairly solid tank compared to most nations.
Russia air is not as good as US at top tier, but does that lead to stompfests like we see in GRB?
No, because ARB top tier typically has US and RU on both sides - a massive difference compared to GRB where only one side has Pantsirs/Kh38/Vikhrs. RU ARB players may perform worse but they don’t have a horrible time like US GRB players do.
US players are no different than other nations, and even if that were true it’s irrelevant. Gaijin normally balances based on the outcome (such as win rate) but for some reason they have a double standard when it comes to US.
Irrelevant. Size of weakspots on the target matters much more than ROF and pen.
And the US has by far the worst. But you’re glancing over that. Cool.
1 Like
Abrams has smaller weakspots, better mobility, better fire rate and better shells than tanks like the Challenger 2, Ariete, Type 90, Merkava and the Chinese MBT
Britain has the same system with no gun (So tenatively worse) and Israel doesnt even have a top tier SPAA at all, Italy only has an SPAAG and Japan’s is good under some conditions, but worse in others.
Only nations that have “good” SPAA at the moment are Soviets, China, France and Sweden. Germany better than most, but worse than others by quite a bit
2 Likes