Ah I was worried for a minute… cuz in this forum there’s actually people who are ok with locking tiers or nations behind paywalls
3 Likes
Pliz post a good source on that. Because the old APG-77 is not better than Byelka. Maybe APG-77V4 would be better with GaN base TM. But that would be comparable to a Bielka with GaN TM that Su-57 would receive in the Future with megapolis project.
Thx to People like Dhimas Afihandarin We have calculate info of how some radar rank with each others.
That’s just some calculation that very conveniently has a Russian AESA on top, when Russia has been very behind on their AESA.
1 Like
Not even the most USA fanboy on forum like Secret project would even try to pull the Russian Bias on Dhimas Afihandarin. His calculation and Knowledge on Radar its respected for a reason.
Respected by who?
1 Like
That’s what I thought, of course it’s respected by you when it conveniently lines up what what you believe. Anyways, that isn’t a Byelka on the comparison, and the Byelka has 1,514 TRM while APG-77 has around 2000
1 Like
Again you don’t know. You can find Byelka calculation on other of his graphic. With early info about Byelka its have about same range of IRBIS. In radar not everything its about the amount of TM. IRBIS only have around 1850. And still top APG77.
according to what? do you know the peak power for the main radar on the Su-57?
2 Likes
I asked you the same thing like 4 post ago. About apg77 being better. You just bring USA cope and propaganda like 0,000000001 RCS. I show you calculation done by someone regarded as unbiased by a lot of people on important aviation forum. Using mathematic formula. And you still cope with your propaganda and arrogance. He is also the guy that every one ask if L-band radar on Su-57 can be use as a normal radar (he denied that capability until better TM can be made). And the guy that has done all RCS calculation and even the one that are badly made from that 101 page.
Edit; His calculation and excel are free on Secret project if you want to do it yourself.
i said it was only better in the main front facing radar (going off peak power and TRM count), and that the Su-57 had way better coverage/awareness
are you sure the guy isnt just adding up the total of the 3 seperate radars?
1 Like
This is what you said.
Also no. People or Russian Fan has try to make the argument that the 3 radar could be used as one. But he has totally denied that capability.
I should’ve been more clear, I mean if the APG-77 was added by itself. The original question asked for a comparison for the F-22 first
1 Like
Well if the F-22 was add alone, sure.
Edit; Also its unknow what variant of the F-22 gaijin will add. Maybe its the one with apg77v1 or 4.
Are you gonna call this propaganda? I don’t understand the hate boner for American 5th gens
3 Likes
people are angry that their country cant make such a thing… pretty sure thats not first time
4 Likes
I’m curious, where have you heard of the APG-77v4?
1 Like
worse submarine for sur
Please be sarcasm
Please be sarcasm
Please be sarcasm
Spoiler
Please be sarcasm
Please be sarcasm
Please be sarcasm
Please be sarcasm
Please be sarcasm
Please be sarcasm
no hate dude, but that is probably indeed propoganda
RCS isnt a number which you can throw in someones face, it highly depends on angle and the frequency. None of which was told for this value.
There are rcs simulations out there considering the geometric stealth of f22, which gave -17dbsm minimum RCS at a certain angle. To reach that -40dbsm, you would need a ram capable of reducing -23dbsm at that specific frequency, which is still a nominal amount, but that would still only achieve -40dbsm at a specific angle. To get the average -40dbsm frequency, you would need a ram capable of -30 to -35dbsm, which would be pretty crazy and will make sense to be put on something like f16 and f15 for a crazy good bvr advantage, but it doesnt happen.
And its been known RCS values publicly known are just a hoax, this was done to prevent soviet analyst acquire real rcs values of the stealth jets in case of a leak through the media, heck the CIA said this for the B-2 spirit bomber, and they already started doing so for the F-22 programme before it even existed
TLDR the -40dbsm is likely not possible, or if it does, it is probably in some weird frequency from a small angle
4 Likes
yeah ik, i was assuming this would be most likely frontal aspect rcs