Not to be that guy but that means nothing, even a warthog got a lock on an f22 once
not to be that guy
but the F-35 pilot said himself that he didnt had a chance
Alright then
queue the Picture of the F-4F with Rafale kill markings (or whatever they are called in trainings) during one of the Frysian flag exercises.
Meanwhile everyone wants the Typhoon nerfed…
no problem
Well in strait up dog fight the Euro fighter has a big advantage over the F-35 not to mention its air frame and twin engines. Overall Eurofighter platform is better than the F-35 despite the F-35 having a lower radar signature.
cant carry them internally tho
Su-57 should be able to carry Izd810.
i am aware about that, but its still not in service yet sadly
F-4 will never get rest.
Phantom Phorever.
In my opinion the Su 57 doesn’t exist in large enough numbers or have enough real world combat data to say it’s better. It may end up being better. There just isn’t enough evidence to say it is.
We can only hope the “data problem” stay that way…
Yeah to be honest I’d rather not have detailed combat data on current hardware like the Su 57, F35, & J35. The implications of that would be really bad. However, I do enjoy theoretical discussions.
And even if the Su-57 is inferior irl, it’s very possible that things will be different in-game. The Su-57 is probably more agile in turnfights, so it might get an advantage in close combat
Fair. This game is only semi realistic. In a real life fight who knows? In game data is based on public open source documentation and that can be incorrect for a variety of reasons.
probably yea , especially with what they did with the LDIRCM on the mi28 (easily spoofing IIR missiles in game). su57 also uses LDIRCM.
The more people realize all simulators are equally incorrect and correct the quicker more people will accept software limitations.