This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
this is pure nonsense, you wouldn’t see a large explosion in the HUD at over 200km range, only an imbecile would even consider this real
where the hell did explosion come from?
the footage is likely some sort of fake
bro where did the “explosion” which you said come from
and any point to back it up as fake?
i didnt see a single explosion
you didn’t even view the footage on the exact post you linked?
why am I even conversing with this level of moron
bro there is NO explosion, i guess you are hallucinating or something
there’s clearly footage of an explosion on the very video you linked, what nonsense are you blabbering.
i think you are confusing the flame of the r37m as a explosion (it is very bright)
I think you are confused to what you have even linked
garbage in garbage out
go share this nonsense with somebody stupid enough to believe it
That was the missile lofting past the HUD.
The “explosion” is the motor burning as the missile accelerates to mach 6.0
this is just bait at this point
and you’re claiming this hud footage of an Su-35 is from a MiG-31 shooting down an aircraft that was shot down by an S-300V, just nonsense
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
and you claimed earlier it was a MiG-31 responsibile
why does the story keep changing?
almost as if it’s not true
1 Like
I’m claiming you dont know the difference between an explosion and a missiles motor burning.
I had not heard about this event. This is from later in the war as the Su-35 and Su-30SM(3) were not carrying R-37M to begin with.
The event I linked was a MiG 31M destroying a MiG 29 at 120+Km with an R-37M.
This is a Su-35 launching a R-37M at a target but we do not see a Radar track.
We know it’s an R-37M as it has the missile selected as such and we see the missile launched.
i wasnt the one who claimed it was from a Mig31, all i said that it was launched from anything but the su57