I didnt see this so late reaply. And no the claim and Radar track are online you can see both.
Further more there is an efficacy report on the VVS and how dangerous the R-37M is to UA aviation produced by the British MoD research and evaluation division.
the video you are thinking of is not from the same claim and is footage from a shot under half the range of what Indian tabloids have claimed
And by whom and how, for example, the victories of the Israeli F-15 are confirmed!?.
F-22 bots continue to believe in RCS at 0.000000001m^2
You must hate USA and Lockheed. RCS is 1e-99 m^2
I’m trying to be objective.
It’s a joke. 1e-99 is a stupid amount of 0’s lol
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
interesting, i wasnt able to find a actual f22 rcs simulation using this tool (ansys)
would be more easier to come to a conclusion for me if i would be able to see a simple 2d picture like this
i also back from any claims where i said su57 rcs was similar to f22/f35, but i still stand the difference isnt that much
for eg. these are simulations from stealth flanker, who has done innumerable rcs simulations on multiple aircrafts, he is working on different variants of kf21 for now
here we can see su57 has 3x the median frontal rcs of f35 when its IRST is stowed (off) in 8ghz
both are treated with same RAM materials
now 3 times might sound big but remember, detection range is proportional to the 4th root of the RCS
interesting thing is that su57 actually performs better than f35 in VHF band, that is mostly due to its large size
also even tho f35 rcs is “0.001 m2” and f22 is “0.0001 m2” blah blah, i believe both f22 and f35 possess similar rcs
the range in that footage is below 100km (probably within 40-50km), not the 200km claimed by the indian tabloid, please try and keep up
if you want to believe garbage Indian sources because of some russia strong narrative you have concocted in your head then feel free
90km is the claimed kill range for the R-37M there was an image floating around showing what the range lines equate to. There is no way a MiG 31 at that time in the conflict would be within 40km of UA airspace not with S-300 and Patriot risk.
It’s difficult to take the moral high ground when both sides presses have flat out lied about every facet of this war. Indian and Russian sources are as equaly credible as Ukrainian and British sources.
I’m not going to staurate this post with them but I urge you to go and critically review Forbes, The Telegraph, The Times and the BBC and ask yourself if it was as bad as these sources claim why have Ukraine not won…
Found it, the yellow dashes indicate 50km range markers which makes sense when the Radar can detect 250km
if thats true, its around 175 km~
why do you come back to indian tabloids all the time, see what he sent next.
Well Indian, Russian, Bulgarian and other have reported the event.
You are showing your biases.
Instead of detaching your personal feelings and not holding other media outlets to the same scrutiny.
This is going knowwhere I have provided a Radar track and report and you call it fake.
because the claim that an Su-57 shot down a Ukrainian aircraft from 200km from an Su-57 was garbage propaganda that originated in an indian tabloid, in reality they used a shootdown of a MiG-29 by a Russian S-300V system
That claim is wrong it was a MiG 31M as shown.
bulgarian - useless
russian - picked it up from the same indian tabloid
radar track, not of the same event and not the distance claimed
there was indeed a 217km r37m kill, but it was launched from anything but the su57, idk where did the felon come in this
it was not from an aircraft, this 217km kill claim was an S-300V SAM system, the claim it was an R-37M missile comes from an indian tabloid
original russian and ukrainian sources cited an S-300V system, an indian tabloid picked up the news and changed the story
