the computers in the Su-57 are not powerful enough to have the same SA capability as the F-35 due to far inferior computer chips
did you run out and check it yourself?
we all know where computer chip manufacturing is significantly behind the curve
What makes you say that? You compared two computers, one from a Su-57 and one from an F-35?
Well, you are already operating on some incomprehensible things taken from the ceiling.
Active protection systems have been used by the Soviet Union and Russia since the 1980s; they have been perfected on helicopters and show very high efficiency.
Datalink actually works starting with the MiG-25, and this “technology” is also very familiar. It differs very little from what you saw in the USA, except that the latter, ground stations were included in it relatively recently.
Regarding “computer chips,” the gap in the military field is not too big, but the plus side is that all production is homemade and you don’t have to run around looking for a replacement when China doesn’t want to sell them.
Then why can I find dozens of videos of said helis getting downed by old Iglas?
TSMC makes more cutting edge chips in the US now than Taiwan, and intel while behind also still has cutting edge nodes
96nm trash is not good enough
I don’t remember anyone knowing about the chip in the Su-57 computer, and what does the process and performance per clock have to do with it?
There’s a lot of cope in this thread, but the sources don’t lie. The west has fallen behind and the future of war thunder belongs to russia. Grind now before it is too late.
Speed at which data can be processed is vital, such old chips are too slow to handle a modern 5th generation battle environment
we have not even began to talk about how far behind on headset mounted displays the Su-57 is, still using rudimentary monocle sights while the F-35 has 360 degree augmented reality vision for visibility through the cockpit
I don’t see a valid comparison. Just your stupid rant based on your dreams. I never saw where the monocle is
US must increase their defence budget to 57 trillion. NOW.
there is no helmet mounted display for the Su-57, only a small monocle sight that is inferior in capability to the F-35s high tech helmet
Not Igla, but Stugna. It’s a fairly primitive ATGM.
No there’s plenty of Igla ones too, though the Ka-52 fleet in particular have been massacred by Stugna-P.
so you’ve only seen pictures of the helmet and you’ve already seen the worst of it. Without even knowing its capabilities
the capability is obvious from the images, only a small simple sight is visible, it clearly lacks the 360 degree augmented reality visibility of the F-35
Why didn’t you bring that helmet?
because that helmet is not in service or serial production
it’s also still far behind the significantly more advanced F-35 helmet with its augmented reality features offering unparalleled situational awareness to the pilot
It’s a marvel on the modern battlefield, completely unparalleled
Russian prototypes are only now catching up to the JHMCS from the 2000s, let alone the F-35s technology
Not all helicopters have these systems. They are definitely installed on the Ka-52 by default, I have seen enough videos where they are fired at more than once and they escape from the attack.
Naturally, you won’t be able to dodge forever, and with active use, the “birds” will fall.
Almost every “cutting edge” chip in USA is from Taiwan.The United States is capable of producing chips smaller than 10 nanometers, but their production is too small to cover any needs.
If I’m not mistaken, the current production basis is 32nm. This is a big difference between what we can do, but it has virtually no effect on completing combat missions, you don’t need to play a The Witcher on these chips.
Good enough for the millitary tasks , at least we can verify this in a real situation.
Again, as an example, we have the ancient radar from the MiG-31, “Zaslon” was developed using 80s technology, it is a huge radar weighing a ton, but at the same time it is one of the most powerful in the world, and surpasses many Western AESA.