I hope so but you never know with this kind of thing
Open data only.
Zaslon-M - detection of 5 m2 at a distance of 180 km.
AN/APG-80 - ~165km
It have. Very high == 100%
The system saved the helicopter from 15 stinger launches, only after the falres ended it was able to be shot down.
Stop coping pls.
More yes than no. The more situational awareness the better.
Another thing is that all the stories about the “augmented reality F-35” are fairy tales.
cope
Oh yeah? You got a source or that?
Nah, I already know you don’t. You’re just spinning wheels.
It’s not a fairy tale, there’s a video of a helmet demonstration. The other question is how reliable it is
Get a VPN for a country outside of russia and search for “ka-52 igla”. You ignoring the multiple shot down helis because your DIRCM is a complete failure doesn’t make it good.
Stop coping Ivan.
5 Likes
Wanna know what’s extra funny? Is that the large majority of their hardware became combat losses because of malfunctions or breakdowns.
So much for being a mighty military that’s been part of a country that’s been economically broke for over half a century. A nation’s army in such a condition cannot create nor field any military hardware that is advanced nor up to date. It’s all just smoke and mirrors.
Cute flag, btw. Doesn’t do anything to actually disprove what I’ve said, not that anyone can anyways because it’s the pure, unfiltered truth.
1 Like
I don’t think they are planning to play AAA titles on it
If you live in an echo chamber and believe everything they say on TV, it doesn’t mean you’re right.
The “Prezident-M” system works and does it very good.
Right back at you ivan. Get a vpn and search for the videos. Stop believing everything rt, sputnik and tass tells you and start thinking for yourself. I’d love to post them but the mods aren’t too fond of them for “reasons”.
Stop coping amd watch the videos. Your “most modern” helicopters are getting massacred by decades old missiles with video proof of it. Leave your echo chamber and actually watch the videos. Your ignorance doesn’t make you right.
3 Likes
You already know he won’t do that. His ego couldn’t handle it lmao.
That’s T-50-4?
They definitely aren’t.
What about its intake ducts? You don’t like the way they look, therefore bad?
Because regardless of it being a 3rd gen or an F-35, MANPADS will kill.
1 Like
Yes, the problem here is more that some idiot thought it was a good idea to send an expensive plane to bomb using unguided bombs against air defenses that hadn’t been suppressed.
1 Like
The MANPADS would need to be able to see, lock, and reach the F-35, though.
The aircraft are suppressing the air defenses, that’s the point of using Su-25s and Su-34s with high explosive ordnance… To deal with infantry.
In which it would do no worse than if it were attacking any other aircraft?
Whether or not it’s an Su-25 or an Su-57M, Iglas and Pioruns are only limited by their maneuverability. Sending an “undetectable” (he obviously has no clue what VLO design is meant for) stealth aircraft will have no sway in its losses.
How does aviation suppress air defenses—with free-fall bombs? Apparently, that’s what Russian generals thought.
1 Like