Is the Su-57 really worse than the F-22?

Its like people choose one or the other and act like that’s reliable to get your opinions and news from when both are horrendous.

ukr

There is nothing to say at all here. The source is as reliable as American media

Cope

Cope x2

I don’t really want to communicate with a person who doesn’t want to get out of his echo chamber.

ironic comment

4 Likes

Hmm. Then why is this coating applied to the canopy?

Do you have any alternative figures on this?

2 Likes

I don’t have any data for a person whose “F-35 is completely invisible to radar”

Looks like you’ve just run out of arguments and knowledge, lol. The F-35 is not unique here.

Spoiler

image

1 Like

uh oh, stinky!

I know about “spraying” on glass. Only it doesn’t make him “completely invisible”, it only reduces radar signature.
My only complaint is that the capabilities of the very mediocre F-35 are greatly exaggerated even compared to the F-22.

the situational awareness and sensor suite of the F-35 are second to none, this is the most important part of 5th generation warfare, dogfighting is an irrelevant joke

3 Likes

i’d like to just translate one of his sеntеnces on Ru-forum

Spoiler


another one, related to F-15 STR. this time

4 Likes

You probably have data on what percentage of radiation still penetrates the cockpit, or something like that.

This raises the question of why the mediocre F-35 is actively engaged in strikes, while the underrated Su-57 launches cruise missiles from the rear. And then there’s also the unclear situation with the Indians.

3 Likes

Hha-ha-ha.

2 Likes

F-35 joint integration with a whole slew of other assets working in conjunction provide situational awareness that far surpasses Su-57, but these characteristics do not look flashy at airshows, so Russian-speaking channels tend to disregard them.

3 Likes

Da da, Ivan.

2 Likes

Hey, Ivan.

This is the ENGLISH side of the forum.

Either speak English or take your leave.

And remember to take your coping and seething with you.

6 Likes

@AUSChalkWarrior & @Mоnarсh We don’t talk about politics/geopolitics here aight?

This is literally an echo chamber.

1 Like

I don’t have exact ones, I suppose you’ll bring me sources where it says that 100% of the radiation is absorbed?

“That different”
Lol.

The MiG-25 has been doing this since the 60s.
Let me remind you that the creator of the datalink was not the United States.
Against this background, let me remind you that the Su-57 can and is already working in tandem with drones, which the F-35 cannot and will not be able to do for another 5 years, at least knowing how its creators like to spend money.

Conclusions based on observations. This is not easy for you here.

I asked them to finish this, I hope what I write next does not fall into these criteria.

I’ll probably ignore those who write not on the point, I’ll lose my temper, I know.