You probably have data on what percentage of radiation still penetrates the cockpit, or something like that.
This raises the question of why the mediocre F-35 is actively engaged in strikes, while the underrated Su-57 launches cruise missiles from the rear. And then there’s also the unclear situation with the Indians.
Hha-ha-ha.
F-35 joint integration with a whole slew of other assets working in conjunction provide situational awareness that far surpasses Su-57, but these characteristics do not look flashy at airshows, so Russian-speaking channels tend to disregard them.
Da da, Ivan.
Hey, Ivan.
This is the ENGLISH side of the forum.
Either speak English or take your leave.
And remember to take your coping and seething with you.
This is literally an echo chamber.
I don’t have exact ones, I suppose you’ll bring me sources where it says that 100% of the radiation is absorbed?
“That different”
Lol.
The MiG-25 has been doing this since the 60s.
Let me remind you that the creator of the datalink was not the United States.
Against this background, let me remind you that the Su-57 can and is already working in tandem with drones, which the F-35 cannot and will not be able to do for another 5 years, at least knowing how its creators like to spend money.
Conclusions based on observations. This is not easy for you here.
I asked them to finish this, I hope what I write next does not fall into these criteria.
I’ll probably ignore those who write not on the point, I’ll lose my temper, I know.
the computers in the Su-57 are not powerful enough to have the same SA capability as the F-35 due to far inferior computer chips
did you run out and check it yourself?
we all know where computer chip manufacturing is significantly behind the curve
What makes you say that? You compared two computers, one from a Su-57 and one from an F-35?
Well, you are already operating on some incomprehensible things taken from the ceiling.
Active protection systems have been used by the Soviet Union and Russia since the 1980s; they have been perfected on helicopters and show very high efficiency.
Datalink actually works starting with the MiG-25, and this “technology” is also very familiar. It differs very little from what you saw in the USA, except that the latter, ground stations were included in it relatively recently.
Regarding “computer chips,” the gap in the military field is not too big, but the plus side is that all production is homemade and you don’t have to run around looking for a replacement when China doesn’t want to sell them.
Then why can I find dozens of videos of said helis getting downed by old Iglas?
TSMC makes more cutting edge chips in the US now than Taiwan, and intel while behind also still has cutting edge nodes
96nm trash is not good enough
I don’t remember anyone knowing about the chip in the Su-57 computer, and what does the process and performance per clock have to do with it?
There’s a lot of cope in this thread, but the sources don’t lie. The west has fallen behind and the future of war thunder belongs to russia. Grind now before it is too late.
Speed at which data can be processed is vital, such old chips are too slow to handle a modern 5th generation battle environment
we have not even began to talk about how far behind on headset mounted displays the Su-57 is, still using rudimentary monocle sights while the F-35 has 360 degree augmented reality vision for visibility through the cockpit
I don’t see a valid comparison. Just your stupid rant based on your dreams. I never saw where the monocle is