just because information makes you upset does not make it nonsense
it’s still an asset lost during action in a war, I’m sure an F-16 crashing on accident during the war in Iraq would have been counted as a US loss all the same, and that analysis doesn’t match because Russia is right next door, and combat actions are taken from Russian airspace all the time
we’re F-16 in the US taking direct combat actions?
are bombers inside Russia taking direct combat actions?
I think you will see the difference
bomber preparing to launch missiles crashes, I consider that a loss
Guys this is just semantics at this point
A lost aircraft is a lost aircraft
And I don’t see what it has to do with the thread
This Tu-22M3 has a maximum missile launch range of 600 kilometres. No one is going to fly a plane from Irkutsk for Ukraine.
The locations in your source are not correct at all. It’s just another crap resource
cope
This looks quite straightforward even in the screenshot from the patent you brought. Engineers should probably explain their decisions to the Indians, who for some reason withdrew from the FGFA project.
It seems you misunderstood something. The cockpit of the F-35 is not visible to radars, which is the whole point of using the metalized coating.
Operation Desert Storm lasted a month, during which the Iraqi army was defeated. Aviation played a significant role in this. The Americans lost 292 killed.
What? Desert Storm is one of the most impressive air operations.
Simply because RedEffect speaks upon eastern equipment does not mean he is a propaganda outlet. You yourself have been listening to too much propaganda if you believe so. You can even go look through his sources and verify if you wish.
If it’s not an echo chamber it’s propaganda
Its like people choose one or the other and act like that’s reliable to get your opinions and news from when both are horrendous.
ukr
There is nothing to say at all here. The source is as reliable as American media
Cope
Cope x2
I don’t really want to communicate with a person who doesn’t want to get out of his echo chamber.
ironic comment
Hmm. Then why is this coating applied to the canopy?
Do you have any alternative figures on this?
I don’t have any data for a person whose “F-35 is completely invisible to radar”