Is the Su-57 really worse than the F-22?

[Josephs_Piano]

@TheArcticFoxxo

They didn’t say they weren’t able to replicate it, they said “weren’t able to obtain the same level of detail”.

All your good work undone by this bit of drivel.

[TheArcticFoxxo]

What?

[Zyranovos]

Considering the F-22 is a stealth air superiority fighter, and the Su-57 is, not all that stealthy, yet given a multirole capability.

They really aren’t comparable, a more realistic look would be like, the F-35 or the F-16, F-35 for stealth, F-16 or F-18 for capabilities .

[dedale_stargate]

yup

the problem with ships radar is that the sheer power of them just allows them to track a stealth plane up close

as for irsts, not every plane can do it, but on top of my head most modern SUs and eurocanards do it too. idk about chinese ones

[BBCRF]

@Josephs_Piano

There is worse… top image is normal operation with engine blades directly visible - mesh screens in bottom image are for foreign-object ingestion defence while on the ground - not a stealth feature.

What kind of nonsense did you write

[BBCRF]

@Just_Baron

The Russian Media lies constantly, you and I both know, or should know, that. Without proof, I won’t believe it.

Absolutely all the media in the world are lying.

[sartt]

because theres nothing lft that it needs to go up against

[Tuurngait]

“Chinese JF-17”

[HIMARS_Enjoyer]

@Armen Lozone

S-400 batteries

Do you have some secret information and just exposed it, or you are just uneducated on the matter?

[HIMARS_Enjoyer]

@Just_Baron

Flying on the border and doing nothing

They sometimes shoot AGMs over the border and i know exactly where they shoot (also fun fact : information that it’s a Su-57 comes from a radar (: )

[Just_Baron]

I acknowledged that later down the thread.

[Silversting]

@Twinnfox209

I fucking love the su-57 but realisticly it would egt shot down before even being able to engage in a dog fight :c

I’ve seen these words somewhere before. Why do you think so?

[Josephs_Piano]

@BBCRF

@Josephs_Piano

There is worse… top image is normal operation with engine blades directly visible - mesh screens in bottom image are for foreign-object ingestion defence while on the ground - not a stealth feature.

What kind of nonsense did you write

All about about aircraft and foreign object damage (FOD) and how they protect against it.

Sorry it’s too much for you.

[Silversting]

@HIMARS_Enjoyer

They sometimes shoot AGMs over the border and i know exactly where they shoot (also fun fact : information that it’s a Su-57 comes from a radar (: )

Where did you get this information?

[BBCRF]

If you don’t know the design of the Su-57 air intakes, then it’s better not to write anything at all.You don’t even know what the protective device looks like on other planes.

[HIMARS_Enjoyer]

1. From a radar operators in the area where Su-57 sometimes fly
2. From attacked city officials who get the same info basically

[Fireball_2020]

Next round of serial aircraft, same issue, we’ll have to start debunking your delusions soon.

[Godvana]

Anyone who thinks the Su-57 is even close to the F-22 is hecking delusional.

[MiG_23M]

As I said, debunked a million times. This isn’t compromising the RCS more than the Raptors’ at all.

[TheArcticFoxxo]

Do you not understand what the wavelength will be used against this aircraft?

The SMALLEST feasible band would be clocking it at 3cm…
Can you tell me how large the heads of those bolts are?

Oh right! Less than 10mm in diameter!

Next he’ll be surprised to find out that the Su-57 would be one of the only aircraft to be able to take advantage of exposed screws, as little to nothing else uses an L band radar suite of 8 radars.