Is the abrams really that bad realistically?

This is actually wrong though. The SEPv2 has the exact same thermals as the SEPv1.

Trying to find 219A images is so hard for Westerners, I appreciate these.

Hope to see this tank in game at some point (Maybe a T-80A too).

Bruh, so that’s much worse, it’s fall to the same problem as Britain before, a whole line up with just different type of Chally 2.
But then, i still stand what i said, the neck will always be the weak spot, even with SepV3 with reinforced hull, turret and even 200mm turret ring. They alway aim for that, no matter what.
It’s the victim of Wallet Warrior back when Su-25K and Turm-T added in Russian TT.

2 Likes

At the Moment there aren’t any “cope cages” in War Thunder

Their only use is to prevent or lower the damage done by top-attack munitions and by loitering drones

So yeah,you can figure out why they’re not in the game at the moment

İ confused cope cages with nets.

You should be able to understand what i referred in my replies tho.

1 Like

Yeah yeah i understood that,it was only a “🤓☝🏻” moment

Incredibly,nets on the T90M works very well with any HEAT shell,so they’re realistically modelled

1 Like

Hopefully Merkava families will also recieve nets.

İt will be nice to have it.

Chains.
merkava-mbt-what-do-these-chain-balls-do-tank-museum-v0-ngu042joy1k91

1 Like

Balls

1 Like

This is an incredibly stupid take. The Avro Vulcan was a mass produced aircraft, not a prototype. Which the F20 was a glorified prototype.

You can get anything acknowledged if you’re an American, just look at the false reports against Gripen, and the false documents used to buff yank crap. Oh and the fact that anyone highlighting inconsistencies with American stuff overperforming gets ignored.

Literally not the case.

Whatever you’re smoking, please share it with the rest of us.

Repeating a mantra with no basis in reality doesn’t make it anymore true.

Gee, worst MBT gets changed from the state it was to still worst MBT. The Abrams got plenty of buffs, and stole a buff from Leclercs.

You can easily pull 15 with it in game.

About as stupid a take as I’ve seen from a yank on this forsaken platform. Shouldn’t really need to go into why, especially if you’re as informed as you pretend to be.

Given I am able to effectively engage Gripens in dogfights with the 16C, and the 16A is far more nimble, I’m calling bullshit. You lot keep putting up false reports to make Gripen into an utter travesty of what it should be, and now it can easily be out fought with an F15.

Oh no, Sweden has good armour and a mediocre round coupled with mediocre mobility. Germany gets a good round and good armour on 1 tank, coupled with mediocre mobility.

Or players sabotaged by the excellence of American teams, as you lot seem intent on painting their players.

That’s about the extent I can be bothered engaging with this. You lot won’t accept facts that contradict your position to the point you file so many reports to get fictional changes that won’t go through for any other nation. At the end of the day, you lot are about as sharp as a ball.

2 Likes

Challenger 2 isn’t the worst MBT in game lol. I think that is just a skill issue. Arietes and Merkavas are both worse than the Challenger 2s.

3 Likes

Mediocre mobility?? They have similar mobility to a lot of other top tiers. The difference between the Abrams and Strv 122 mobility wise is not that big as you make it out to be.

m/95 is also a very good and capable round.

They have the best combination of mobility, armor and survivability with also easily competitive firepower. Again this seems like a massive skill issue.

They are braindead easy to play lmao.

Bad teammates don’t influence your ability to aim or your ability to position yourself well.

It’s more of a thing of me questioning the opinion of someone who clearly isn’t very good at the game.

1 Like

Hence my mentioning of the EAP, the Vulcan was added for the pop-culture effect.

M735 being falsely nerfed, Abrams armor bug reports, the Abrams getting a realistic reload would like to have a word.

The only non-event vehicle light tank the US tech tree has is the HSTV-L, and it is at least 1.0 BR overtiered.

Um have you seen the Swedish or Germany tech trees? Like have you?

That’s what I’m trying to tell you.

Plenty of buffs when? It’s not accurate to even the non-DU Swedish Trials export model. The Abrams getting a realistic reload isn’t stealing.

I’ve seen people rip wings at 9G, so that’s not true.

How is saying “if you’re going to make manual loaders more realistic, you need to make autoloaders more realistic” a stupid take?

From most people I’ve heard, it is barely (baaaaarely) better than the Gripen, but ok.

Best armor in the game, third best round in the game (not counting Obj 292), same mobility as 2A7V. Not sure what you’re complaining about.

I could say the same for you.

1 Like

1 Like

give those playes unpenetrable hull, turret cheeks and spall liners and let’s see if they’re gonna get high kills or not.

As i said before its a matter of armor, germany wasn’t always the 2nd top tier with one of the highest winrates untill they got a leo 2a7 with spall liners and a cool hull, imagine if USA got DU in their hull it would be a game changer and their turret ring not exposed anymore.

In every nation there’s alot of people that still don’t know how to play, but there’s also players that do know how to play, give them all good armor and let’s see.

Omg he’s literally me (i’m the owner of a cartel and i spend my money on useless premiums (in reality the only premiums i have were rewarded to me during events))

Actually 6/10 times Gripen wins against Block-10, at least thats what i heard.

İ wouldnt call that barely better then Gripen tbh.

As I said to another guy about this.

1 Like

When 1 or multiple nations have a big inherent advantage over other nations when it comes to contesting the game objectives, aka the caps, the nations without such advantages will usually perform worse.

Armor, survivability and mobility combined will always be better at contesting the objectives. Sure you can sit on the flank all day, but that will still end in a loss. If you pitch 2 equally skilled players against eachother, one in a Strv 122 and the other in a SEPv2 (could be most other tanks), the Strv 122 will likely win most of the time.

2 Likes

The thing is, you can play RU or Germany or Sweden being aggressive and showing armor with higher chance of surviving the first shot than US.