yes engine limitations if they would need to simulate every net of the tank redirecting it would be kinda performance heavy
Aside from Strv122 and Leopard2A7V no, most of them either equal to Russian tanks or worse in some cases.
Current best Tanks are STRV122 family.
This is kinda true, having Click Bait and Aim players on your team certainly effects overall winrates but this doesnt change the fact that Abrams family needs fixes.
1 Like
It doesnt have to be calculated that way.
Plus theres not much sense in adding the redirect in the first place
İnteresting, guess im gonna try when i see T-90M next time.
Thanks for the advice.
Im gonna find IRL images and the solution T-80BV crew would do to protect their turret better.
you mean the additional nets in front of the turret ?
Gonna say this most of the tanks have exposed turret ring its not only abrams
İ know BVM also has exposed turret ring under RELIKT ERA but most of the time i prefer to avoid it due to not want to getting trolled by Gaijin.
its always better to shoot gun/breach in this game its literally 100% chance to kill against any soviet tank (they can’t reverse)
1 Like
No, ERA covergae on turret and turret necks.
Spoiler
Leningrad’s T-80 had some weird design choices for ERA coverage, leavibg most of side profile unprotected, as well as having huge gaps.
There were some T-80BV crews to manually adjust positions of K-1 in order to havw better coverage of turret neck.
Spoiler
Tanks with K-5/ Relikt usually have it worse due to both being much more dependant and picky on where they can be mounted with their effect staying the same.
Except 292.
İ dont know why but that thing loves to absorb any APFSDS with its barrel sometimes.
2 days ago it absorbed my 3 JM33 fired from my Type-90, guess having thicker gun barrel somehow helps.
well there is still the breach
Well you dont always have access to breach in some angles in that case his barrel was exposed.
Even on earlier prototype tanks like Object 219A (later will become T-80U) had better ERA coverage in 1984.
Later that ERA coverage was used on T-80UD of early models.
2 Likes
Which ones? Any other abrams and leopard has better speed back and forward, elevation angles and speed than soviets/chinese. If you are talking about ariete, it’s syndrome of minor nation
Strv 122 ≠ leo 2a7?
Reload 0,5 seconds, speed 1000 kmh and meter of armor?
Found that.
1 Like
Aside from Strv122 and Leo2A7 all russian tanks have better armor, better thermal resolution, better Vertical targeting speed at top tier.
Regular leopards and Abrams on the other hand have better reload and reverse speed.
No, current Leopard2A7V’s armor is a mess, its objectively worse then Strv122.
Reloads in 5 seconds if you have ace crew only, not to mention if you loose two crew members you can say goodbye to that reload.
68 km for M1A2 SEP V2 and mostly it doesnt reach that speed unless you’re in flat terrain and takes quite amount of time to reach because of its ground pressure.
You mean turret armor can be penetrated by Dm53? Yeah not so armored isnt it?
2 Likes
There is definitely a meta at top tier lol. The meta is a combination of armor, mobility and survivability. The A2 and SEPv1 only have 1 of those, the SEPv2 has none.
If it was just US teams being bad and the tanks were good, your M1A1 AIM stats would be a lot better lol.
1 Like
Is that why Sweden is the best top tier ground nation currently?
I mean it takes a different level of bad player to not have at least a 1.5-2 K/D in tanks like the Strv 122s.
1 Like