What? I talked about Abrams for most of my posts and continue to do so.
Yeah, I shouldn’t respond to people that make off-topic posts, I’m working on that.
I however never make an off-topic post initially.
I don’t see why but that is just what I have observed. (I personally like your takes)
I dont like him.
1 Like
Ok and?
I apologize for my mistakes that have caused issue between us.
I can only insist that I’m here wanting Abrams to be as accurate as possible.
And for other topics I support the WT community as well.
1 Like
another cope from razervon as always, u defending Russia*, u never defended Abrams maybe u will if you’re not brainwashed or an employee anymore.
Years of defending Abrams is never?
668 realistic battles in Abrams, +214 in one of the prototypes. Pretty sure I love Abrams.
Also the name’s Alvis.
Never defended Russia in my life.
The kindest thing I’ve said for Russian military equipment is “Their lack of training doesn’t bring out the benefits of the vehicles IRL.”
1 Like
Maybe if i’m used to live in this forum i would keep screenshots of u glazing gaijin and their bias towards Russia, but unfortunately i don’t.
Maybe before being an Employee maybe.
U don’t, stop lying to yourself.
1 Like
Game says I have 668 battles in all the Abrams. And 214 in one of the prototypes.
Also I am not an employee. Employees have icons next to their names as well.
On top of that, why do you keep calling Americans employees?
lemme see that winrate tho
Hey if you want to help me improve the abram’s armor please leave a link to a website on this the forum i created called armor on NATO tanks.
Here is the link
Hnnnnnggggghhh I look up his record, he is a damn good player though, seems like he played everything, Germany, USSR and USA, everything he played maintained a good KDR, unlike many players in this thread who only played one nation, which explains the perception bias.
2 Likes
I increased my Begleit KDR to 0.8 from 0.61 today since I haven’t actually played it actively in years.
It’ll probably be over 1:1 at some point.
I have air completed to my standards.
I have 4 tech trees to get to top on ground, and a few vehicles left of the rest to get before I feel complete there and am playing purely for enjoyment and helicopters after that.
Then why doesnt obj 292 negatively effect russian win rates at top tier?
First of all Obj292 isnt a top tier tank and for its br its basically broken, even low skill players can perform quite Well with that tank because of firepower.
Second of all i only see couple Obj292 at top tier while im playing Russians and im playing constantly because of T-90M grind which doesnt effect Russian top tier win rate overall.
Situation is not the same.
Yeah, but its used plenty in top tier and to good effect. Its perfectly vuabke there.
Only for the first couple of weeks, after that obj292 players numbers decreased rapidely at top tier.
Differences between Obj292 and other tanks is the ability to point and click, an APFSDS that can penetrate 700m or a HE shell that can easily overpressure any tank makes Obj292 relatively easy play to tank although any experienced top tier player can easily disable/one shot Obj292 because it doesnt have enough armor to survive against top tier shells.
Thats why people stopped spamming that vehicle at top tier.
The argument is “noobs” jump into top tier usa and ruin it with purchased vehicles…why then doesn’t it happen to russia with 292, 2s38, bmp2m, t80uk, moderna, turms etc… ALL used effectively in top tier while being purchasable and many 10.0?
Everything is “usable”, but lower-BR vehicles are far worse at winning matches than the at-BR vehicles.
You obviously dont play them.