there one guy with a 99% win rate in the leos
Further, the very first match I ever played with my M1A2 is me one-shotting a bunch of vehicles with basic M829, followed by them requiring 4 hits to knock me out in return.
Witch-hunting and textbook example of ad hominem? Very common for people of your mindset.
2 Likes
… ???
and very common of people like you that haven’t read what necrons has been saying for years
I don’t doubt that there are times where he keeps taking lots of hits, because there are enough incredibly bad people playing this game or just average players that have a bad day.
I’m just impressed that people can be that bad.
Holy aim issue.
nope the spall just missed the command and gunner hit everything else hit the engine, the fuel tank
There is a lot of that on these forums were players either don’t have a tank their talking about or just flat out awful at the game. I’ve seen so many players talk about the Abrams performance without even owning the tank lol.
3 Likes
iTs nOt tHe tAnk, iT’s tHe pLaYers
Clickbait was released during the Update “Air Superiority” December 14th 2023.
4 Likes
Those are 2019 and 2020. The actual changes are:
Before Clickbait: 44.5%
A month after Clickbait: 38.858%
Two months after Clickbait: 37.937%
Six months after Clickbait: 37.209%
5 Likes
The vast majority of clips showed hits from MBT’s, not autocannons.
You claimed I was lying, I then presented videos that showing me taking countless hits from various opponents, including Leopard 2’s, T-80’s, etc.
There’s also plenty of top-tier MBT’s with worse survivability that would’ve certainly died from the autocannon hits to the side.
I’ve got nearly 2K kills in my M1A1, even if only 40% are up-tiers that’s still 700-800 kills against top-tier opponents.
Your stats on the Warrior are sitting on a 29% winrate and negative K/D, ‘‘you must be so bad’’.
Goes both ways mate.
At least my stock M1A2 is still on a 1.5 K/D.
Cherry-picking a vehicle that someone only has an extremely small sample size on, and then acting as though that’s representative of anything is something I can do as well as anyone.
1 Like
Ah I should have clarified. When Gaijin messed up the Abrams, W/L rate dropped from 76% to 48% a total of 28% change. Clickbaits only dropped the W/L rate 7%. If the Abrams wasn’t screwed it’d only be a 69% W/L rate after Clickbait was added
2 Likes
Abrams was actually buffed multiple times in the time that the winrate dropped from 76% to 48%.
The reason why the winrate was 76% in your first screenshot to begin with is fotm. Iirc 09-12 was like a month after the M1A2 was released as the only top tier MBT in said update, so of course multi nation players flocked to it.
Same way that the Leopard 2 PSO seriously increased German top toer winrates, while the tank itself is pretty much a sidegrade at best compared to the 2A6.
1 Like
who cares its one persons account of cherry picked situations compared to the literal mountain of data showing otherwise.
and? This just proves my point.
AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHH yeah yeah lmao cherry picking a tank i played like 2 times that is probably one of the worst tanks in the entire game lmao cope more. Also picking a tank that has no bearing on this conversation at all, classic.
and 17% win rate, k/d is easy to farm I know I have high k/d as you saw. But win rate shows overall team contribution plus overall TEAM success. What this shows is that you camp like a bot and have 0 impact on games. And also proves that america teams full of trash abrams lose a lot because you sure are not carrying the teams your on. What you omitted is that my 80% overall win rates are far better than yours and my k/d are better. So what is it? You are not good enough to pull stats on me so you need a better argument than “i do well in them.”
3 Likes
It’s fun bc the entire Abrams series took a interesting hit from the detailed modules such as the hydraulic pump. It is, without joking, the solely reason i don’t play US top tier anymore, period. If you survive a hit, you get the hydraulic disabled 92% of the time, and in the end, is the same result as getting hit on any aiming drive, but on a much more sensitive module.
It was such an unnecesary low-key nerf to an already struggling platform.
6 Likes
At this point I’d just be happy if Gaijin would just removed the duffel bags from the bustle wrack of the Abrams. No one would go in to combat like that… At the expense of sounding silly; it’s immersion breaking. I would never have done that with my duffel bag. No one would have. I don’t know why Gaijin thinks anyone would.
Unless it’s just more of the typical “ha ha Americans weird” crap from Gaijin, which, wouldn’t surprise me.
1 Like
-
‘‘My M1’s regularly tank up to 11+ hits’’
-
‘‘Nah, you’re lying’’
-
Shows multiple examples
-
‘‘Who cares, cherry-picked examples’’
Look, if you’re going to move the goalpost and deflect at every turn, why do you even bother arguing in the first place?
The manner in which you’re arguing also comes off as rather insecure/child-like. Just discuss the topic and present arguments with supporting evidence.
Given the amount of hours you’ve got in the game, I’ll guess you’re not 13 years old so the ‘‘HAHAHA lmao cope’’ just makes me worry about your mental state.
That’s literally what you’re doing.
In fact, you’ve got more battles played in that Warrior than I do in my M1A2, yet you saw no issues pulling that M1A2 stat card.
Pot calling the kettle black?
Surely you’ll have noticed I don’t play CAS, I don’t enjoy it nor do I have any of those aircraft researched.
I’m also a solo player, I don’t squad up nor am I even in a squadron, yet my M1’s are still between a 61-74% winrate. If you want to argue that I don’t contribute to the team with that in mind, you better not look silly saying it.
3 Likes
They fought against export version T- 72s with about 100mm less protection against kenetic rounds. 72bs were never in Iraq , that is a tank from the 1980s Irag never had access to it.
1 Like