@NEVERAGAIN_FTH I would encourage both of you to delete your posts before you get this topic closed.
I haven’t said anything that should get it closed, by simply stating doctrine and facts…
You enagaged.
aswell as posted a picture. Of something that is currently considered politcal.
To teach someone about how this actually works.
Oooh, Propaganda, so scary.
Realistically combined with the Sep v2s external armor plates even DM42s should not penetrate but in all instances both models are penetrated. The Sep v2 should actually get a total of 400+ penetration resistance at 60 or more degrees to the side
1 Like
Yeah I don’t care. That shit is how topics get closed. There is a reason I am telling you both to delete it.
Source?
7 Likes
600, is so, so massively unrealistic.
Not even Russia has the balls to say their newest ERA (Relikt) can stop that much of a Solid penetrator.
6 Likes
Yeah again CE sure. KE no.
1 Like
Even for CE that’s high, for Relikt and TUSK.
It should be more like 350-450, at best, 500. Good thing Tanks rarely use Chem rounds against tanks anymore.
Not really I think the LEO2A7 has about 1200 CE protection at that angle. For once I am home when on this forum and was able to check. Doesn’t even use ERA.
Yeah, that’s the entire purpose of modern composite, is to make CE rounds practically useless to make the need or ERA non-existent.
ERA is a cheap lighter option to amplify armor. I check the SEP without TUSK it has a similar protection against CE.
1 Like
Yep…
Put your heading angle to 19 degrees
You’re changing the angle from like, 110 ish degrees to 170°
3 Likes
You use acute for armor values?
Listen there is issues with the modeling of the Abrams in WT. But manufacturing things by changing angles to fit an argument isn’t going to help.
5 Likes