hELLO
И тебе привет. И какую из наций я хочу поднять?) Я играю то на всех. Но ситуация с подбоями, которые являются одноразовой защитой от ваншорта меня до жути бесит. Мне было бы достаточно удаления нахрен подбоев из игры,а не"возвышение" какойто нации
Like how it saved entire Soviet top tier while none of those vehicles had Spall liners? Clearly the days when Russia was dominating the top tier was just skill issue on other nation mains.
Half true Spall liners are inconsistent sometimes it negates the Damage compeletly and sometimes it doesnt do shit, it needs proper rework.
Thats the whole point of Spall liners and increased armor in case you didnt noticed, unlike Russia Nato care about their soldiers thats why they produced such tanks with blowout panels,increased armor effectiveness and Spall liners hell even Russia realized how important crew survivability is and they decided to implement Spall liners on T90M.
Then you should be able to cripple or damage him easily but clearly you need to one shot every tank on your sight.
Even on the gaming forum there are people like you. Can you throw propaganda in the trash and never talk about it again?
I don’t even know how to comment on this. Why does everyone ignore the fact that you shoot at a leopard and it doesn’t take damage because the lining “ate” all the fragments? And in response, in a split second, you get a one-shot, since your technique is without such “magical protection from ponies and rainbows”
The BVM side plate has done the same for years without a spall liner but for some reason nothing was done about it, why is it only an issue if leopards does it?
Just like a UFP of Leo2’s
I wrote about the disgusting damage of shells, not here, but on the RU forum. For some reason, you think that I am fighting exclusively for the USSR to be the strongest, although I have already said that I play all the main nations of the game
You still have un-pennable ERA. You dont need spall liners.
Who you are? Who are you?! I didn’t speak for the USSR at all or that they were “weak”
While i’ve had that happen, not nearly to the same extension as the BVM side which is much weaker
I’m not on the RU forums and even if i was, there’s no guarantee i would have seen it
I haven’t said you’re fighting exclusively for the USSR however right now you’re talking about the Leo’s spall liner
Kinda I have to aim weakspot on T-80BVM or T-90M also they need to aim my Strv122 weakspot too. fair enough for me
yes, I’m talking about leopards, without specifying which one, since there are several of them and they are not very different (Strv and Leo)
It all depends on how often and for which side you play. If you shoot and don’t do damage, it just pisses you off. But if you were shot and no damage was done to you (including because of a bug or the like), then you take it for granted and just smile. I have experience from both sides. So I understand what I’m talking about
Again. The problem is not to break through. Top tanks penetrate each other without any problems. The problem is that after penetration there is no damage. At all. A projectile can fly in and out without killing anyone or even knocking out a single module, although the projectile passed close to the head within a conventional 5 cm
Just like with BVM between red skies and air superiority :)
Drivers area is not covered in spall liner and 3 out of 4 crewmen sit there in conga line.
Turret ring also doesnt have spall liner.
Truth hurts doesnt it? You might wanna check how russian vehicles performs on Ukraine in that case.
Because this is compeletly lie, Spall liners are inconsistent therefore it doesnt protect hundred percent all the times not to mention you can always aim weak spots and cripple the Leopard before killing him.
Sounds like heavy skill issue.
Mmh.
This does kinda proof how important it is to survive that first shot and how much it impacts winrates.
Sounds like someone getting butthurt because he couldnt handle the truth.
Warthunder models every vehicle based on official reports(at least they try to) and you’re claiming Leopards shouldnt suppose to perform like that. Well i have more bad news for you, if gaijin properly model those Leopard2’s you wouldnt even be able to penetrate their gun mantlet while DM53 can cut straight through Kontakt-5 on long range and Relikt on close range, would you like to experience that?
İ pointed ongoing conflict in real life cause apperently everytime we talked about how Russian tanks perform better then irl performance it becomes propaganda.
Either grow up and accept the reality or dont even bother to reply.
Your replies shows the other way.
Dunno, you tell me.
Couldnt care less tbh.
Not as funny as you considering how do you react to Leopards.
You’re the one who takes the crown in that case.
İm pretty sure i read more books then you, dont need your advice.
You’re the one who blamed me for making propaganda in the first place, at least be a honest and stay consistent, lmao.
Well new variant of Leopard2 are designed to be very survivable from design to ammunition (DM63 and DM11) which no surprise of it more survivable than any Russian tanks even in the game
Even more surv. then Abrams etc? we are not only talking about Russian technology